madlib-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frank McQuillan <fmcquil...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.10-rc1
Date Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:10:10 GMT
Roman,

Does this apply retro-actively back to initial grant of the code to ASF?
Or just from the last release 1.9.1?

Frank

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:

> Here's the ultimate resolution on the IP issue:
>    * we don't do anything with existing (BSD) files even if we edit them
>    * every new file we create gets an ASF license header
>
> More details:
>    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-293?
> focusedCommentId=15881595&page=com.atlassian.jira.
> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15881595
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Frank McQuillan <fmcquillan@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> > Thanks Roman for working on this.
> >
> > If you feel a final answer will be ready next week, then yes by all
> means l
> > would suggest to the community that we wait and re-spin an RC2 with the
> > license headers issue resolved.  Seems less overhead and effort than a
> > quick follow on release right after 1.10.  Also, there some momentum
> going
> > with the legal discussion, so let's take advantage of that.
> >
> > Satoshi (release manager), are you OK pausing the RC2 until we hear back
> > from Roman next week?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Frank
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Frank McQuillan <fmcquillan@pivotal.io
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Agree with Rahul re putting up an RC2 with the suggested changes from
> >> Roman,
> >> > including incorporating Ed's comments on copyright year and top level
> >> folder
> >> > naming.  These are really items but let's respond to the RC1 reviewers
> >> the
> >> > best way we can.
> >>
> >> +1 to a respin.
> >>
> >> > Regarding the ASF legal issue being discussed, MADLib community is
> more
> >> than
> >> > happy to respond to any guidance from the fine folks at the ASF around
> >> > headers with appropriate licensing verbage.  We just need to know what
> >> that
> >> > guidance is.
> >>
> >> Well, if you're ok respinning next week I hope to get you a final
> >> answer by then.
> >> Might as well kill two birds with the same RC. Or we can quickly do a
> >> follow up
> >> release once the licensing headers dust settles. Up to you guys.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Roman.
> >>
>

Mime
View raw message