lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Elad Margalit <eladm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 4.8.0-beta00006
Date Sat, 10 Aug 2019 17:16:54 GMT
+1

On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 3:08 PM Fabio Buscaroli <fbuscaroli@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Ottieni Outlook per Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Laimonas Simutis <laimis@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2019 1:59:25 PM
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org <dev@lucenenet.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 4.8.0-beta00006
>
> +1
>
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 7:57 AM Shad Storhaug <shad@shadstorhaug.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Well, if you didn't get an invitation to Azure DevOps and you are a
> > Lucene.NET PMC member it is because someone at Microsoft decided that the
> > free public plan with 10 parallel jobs should have no more than 5 users.
> I
> > could set up a public NuGet feed (against Apache's policy), but do I
> really
> > need to for a release vote?  You all can download the packages from the
> > Apache repo and then setup a local folder as a NuGet feed:
> >
> https://www.codemag.com/Article/1301101/The-Simplest-Thing-Possible-A-File-Directory-based-NuGet-Feed
> >
> > Don't get me wrong, I hope we can get everyone on an Azure DevOps plan,
> > but this issue is unlikely to be resolved in time for the release vote.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shad Storhaug <shad@shadstorhaug.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2019 5:42 AM
> > Cc: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 4.8.0-beta00006
> >
> > It’s hard to believe almost 2 years went by without a fresh release, but
> > it’s definitely time for a new one.
> >
> > This release includes some critical stability and performance updates:
> >
> >
> >   1.  ConcurrentMergeScheduler has been patched so it no longer causes a
> > fatal crash upon a merge failure
> >   2.  TaskMergeScheduler also had a bug where it was supposed to throw an
> > exception on merge failure, but didn’t
> >   3.  CanonPath in FileSupport.cs was made thread-safe (Thanks Mathew and
> > Aaron!)
> >   4.  Another concurrency issue was patched in NativeFSLockFactory
> (Thanks
> > sourceist!)
> >   5.  Tests have been setup to run on Linux and macOS, and we discovered
> > many culture sensitivity and a few cross-platform bugs that have been
> > patched.
> >
> > In addition, the Lucene.Net.ICU functionality is now (finally)
> > feature-complete, we have added strong naming, the lucene-cli tool has
> been
> > packaged up for release on NuGet so it can be installed using dotnet.exe,
> > and all NuGet packages now support .NET Standard 2.0 in addition to .NET
> > Standard 1.6 and .NET Framework 4.5.
> >
> > Upon this release, we can resolve the following open JIRA issues:
> >
> > LUCENENET-603 - ConcurrentMergeScheduler crashes the application if a
> > transient error occurs
> > LUCENENET-607 - InvalidCastException PendingTerm cannot be cast to
> > PendingBlock
> > LUCENENET-573 - Make IcuBreakIterator more like the JDK's
> > BreakIterator.getInstance()
> > LUCENENET-446 - Make Lucene.Net CLS Compliant
> > LUCENENET-608 - Add strong-naming to Lucene.Net to comply with Microsoft
> > guidelines
> > LUCENENET-563 - Port Lucene.Net.Demo
> > LUCENENET-566 - Port Lucene.Net.Analysis.ICU
> > LUCENENET-588 - Create unified CLI tool to wrap all Lucene maintenance
> > tools and demos for .NET
> >
> > And these issues may also be addressed by the completion of the ICU
> > functionality, but need to confirm:
> >
> > LUCENENET-604 - Search text without accent to get text has accent
> > LUCENENET-599 - Fine-grained segmentation tools with vectorHighlight will
> > cause bug
> >
> > The testing time has been significantly reduced by the latest .NET Core
> > SDK and by running the tests in parallel. What used to take about 2-3
> hours
> > from the command line can now be done in about 45 minutes, so hopefully
> you
> > won’t fall asleep this time waiting for the tests to complete 😊. Do note
> > that I noticed an issue with the tests not running from build.bat if the
> > folder that the source code is unzipped to has spaces or parenthesis in
> it
> > – there is just an escaping issue. Put the source in a folder with no
> > spaces or parenthesis and the tests run fine.
> >
> > Things are a bit in flux at the moment with the release process, but here
> > is what we have put together now:
> >
> > Test results of this release build:
> >
> https://dev.azure.com/lucene-net/Lucene.NET/_build/results?buildId=6&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab
> > Build artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >
> https://dev.azure.com/lucene-net/Lucene.NET/_build/results?buildId=6&view=results
> > And of course also from the official Apache dist repo:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucenenet/
> >
> > The tag is:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/releases/tag/Lucene.Net_4_8_0_beta00006
> > There is a NuGet package feed here:
> >
> https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/lucene-net/_packaging/lucene-net-release-vote/nuget/v3/index.json
> >
> > But do note the NuGet feed is not public (as per Apache’s policies) and I
> > will need to grant access to the Azure DevOps project to all committers
> and
> > PMC so it can be accessed. I will send invites, but if you have a
> preferred
> > email that you want to use to login to Azure DevOps with, please email me
> > the address shad -AT- shadstorhaug.com.
> >
> > This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. sometime
> after
> > 22:30 UTC 12-August-2019. All Lucene.NET committers, PMC members, and dev
> > mailing list members are encouraged to participate in the voting process.
> > We only count the PMC as official votes, but the feedback of the
> community
> > is also valuable.
> >
> >
> > +1 – Yes, release it already
> > 0 – Neutral, no opinion
> > -1 – Hold everything, we need to address…
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message