lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: Moving Lucene.NET to .NET Core
Date Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:11:38 GMT
Oren, Arkadiusz, Lucene.NET 3.x doesn't have any resemblance to the
Lucene.NET 4.8 code base. Same goes to most dependencies. It would have
been nice if this was contributed back to the project back in the day, but
now it doesn't help.

--

Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Lucene.NET committer and PMC member

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Arkadiusz Palinski <arek@ravendb.net>
wrote:

> Also all of the dependencies of Lucene.NET are ported in the following
> branches:
>
> - https://github.com/ppekrol/PowerCollections/tree/master-dnx
> - https://github.com/ppekrol/GeoAPI/tree/master-dnx
> - https://github.com/ppekrol/NetTopologySuite/tree/master-dnx
> - https://github.com/ppekrol/Spatial4n/tree/master-dnx
>
> In order to compile Lucene.NET  put all of the above in the same directory.
> We had to change directory structure and project names, because CoreCLR is
> taking project names (and dll names) from directory names.
>
> Some tests are intentionally skipped for CoreCLR, mostly because binary
> serialization is no longer supported there.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Oren Eini (Ayende Rahien) <
> ayende@ayende.com> wrote:
>
> > We ported Lucene 3.0.3 (with some modifications that we needed) to
> CoreCLR,
> > you can find it here:
> > https://github.com/ppekrol/lucene.net/tree/3.0.3-dnx
> >
> > *Hibernating Rhinos Ltd  *
> >
> > Oren Eini* l CEO l *Mobile: + 972-52-548-6969
> >
> > Office: +972-4-622-7811 *l *Fax: +972-153-4-622-7811
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Connie Yau <conniey@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Our team is working to make Lucene.NET run on .NET Core and was
> wondering
> > > if anyone else was working on this or would it be alright if we started
> > > this effort?
> > >
> > > Also, I was hoping that someone could answer a few questions I have
> about
> > > this project:
> > >
> > > 1.       What branch should we be basing our effort on?
> > >
> > > *         In Community<http://lucenenet.apache.org/community.html>,
> the
> > > documentation says "Most work currently happens on the branch named
> > > branch_4x<
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucenenet.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/branch_4x
> > >."
> > > but it looks like the latest commits are in `master`
> > >
> > > 2.       How do we build this project?
> > >
> > > *         I read Build System & Scripts<
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=27824229>
> > > but there doesn't appear to be a build.cmd in the repository<
> > > https://github.com/apache/lucenenet>
> > >
> > > 3.       What is the expected release date for Lucene.NET v4.8?
> > >
> > > 4.       Regarding pull requests, is the preference for incremental
> > > changes (ie. Updating a set of APIs from one to another) or to have a
> > large
> > > pull request (ie. Moving to run on .NET Core with all the associated
> > > project/code changes)?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Connie Yau
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Arek Palinski
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message