lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: 4.x Stories to be picked up
Date Sun, 04 Jan 2015 16:22:58 GMT
Yes, the tokenizer implementations

--

Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com> wrote:

> Ah, I thought there was some place they were using another parser
> generator, but in the case of Antlr grammar already there, have at it.
>
>
> Paul Irwin
> Lead Software Engineer
> feature[23]
>
> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> Cell: 863-698-9294
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
> wrote:
>
> > They are using Antlr for generating the Java bits there anyway..
> >
> > --
> >
> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I'd caution against reinventing the wheel on the parsing right now. It
> > may
> > > be a faster path to just convert the generated java parsers into C#
> using
> > > an automated tool, as I did on my earlier Lucene 4.3 porting so I can
> > > attest to it. I was able to validate that they parsed correctly and
> even
> > > used that ported code in a production app. Rewriting a parser may not
> be
> > > the best use of time right now -- although I can certainly see the
> value
> > in
> > > doing so later on.
> > >
> > > You can use my little utility to convert the syntax of entire files at
> > > once: https://github.com/paulirwin/javatocsharp
> > >
> > >
> > > Paul Irwin
> > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > feature[23]
> > >
> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Itamar and Laimonas. I appreciate the details and glad to help
> > . I
> > > > got started on Expressions and half way there. I'm using Antlr 4.3
> for
> > > the
> > > > parsing. Please let me know if that is what y'all were planning to
> use
> > > > anyway. I'll get to the index tests in core after that
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> itamar@code972.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Hakeem, welcome on board!
> > > > >
> > > > > Laimonas's response is spot on, let us know if you have any further
> > > > > questions.
> > > > >
> > > > > I personally don't have any preference - once we get to 0 test
> > failures
> > > > in
> > > > > the core we will concentrate on finishing porting the rest of the
> > > > > sub-projects (Analysis.Common, Codecs, Suggest) with all their
> tests,
> > > and
> > > > > then porting more sub-projects.
> > > > >
> > > > > So I guess pick whatever you think you'd enjoy most, just make sure
> > to
> > > > keep
> > > > > us in the loop!
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <
> > hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just joined this group and looking to offer some help in
> updating
> > > > > Lucene
> > > > > > to 4.8. I briefly skimmed thru but could not find any items
> related
> > > to
> > > > > the
> > > > > > 4.x work. I'd very much appreciate it if someone can let me
know
> > the
> > > > > > process for picking up items to work on. I spent a couple weeks
> > > > updating
> > > > > an
> > > > > > outdated branch of Lucene, so trying to avoid that mistake again
> :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message