lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: 4.x Stories to be picked up
Date Sun, 04 Jan 2015 16:14:02 GMT
They are using Antlr for generating the Java bits there anyway..

--

Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com> wrote:

> I'd caution against reinventing the wheel on the parsing right now. It may
> be a faster path to just convert the generated java parsers into C# using
> an automated tool, as I did on my earlier Lucene 4.3 porting so I can
> attest to it. I was able to validate that they parsed correctly and even
> used that ported code in a production app. Rewriting a parser may not be
> the best use of time right now -- although I can certainly see the value in
> doing so later on.
>
> You can use my little utility to convert the syntax of entire files at
> once: https://github.com/paulirwin/javatocsharp
>
>
> Paul Irwin
> Lead Software Engineer
> feature[23]
>
> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> Cell: 863-698-9294
>
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Itamar and Laimonas. I appreciate the details and glad to help . I
> > got started on Expressions and half way there. I'm using Antlr 4.3 for
> the
> > parsing. Please let me know if that is what y'all were planning to use
> > anyway. I'll get to the index tests in core after that
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Hakeem, welcome on board!
> > >
> > > Laimonas's response is spot on, let us know if you have any further
> > > questions.
> > >
> > > I personally don't have any preference - once we get to 0 test failures
> > in
> > > the core we will concentrate on finishing porting the rest of the
> > > sub-projects (Analysis.Common, Codecs, Suggest) with all their tests,
> and
> > > then porting more sub-projects.
> > >
> > > So I guess pick whatever you think you'd enjoy most, just make sure to
> > keep
> > > us in the loop!
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I just joined this group and looking to offer some help in updating
> > > Lucene
> > > > to 4.8. I briefly skimmed thru but could not find any items related
> to
> > > the
> > > > 4.x work. I'd very much appreciate it if someone can let me know the
> > > > process for picking up items to work on. I spent a couple weeks
> > updating
> > > an
> > > > outdated branch of Lucene, so trying to avoid that mistake again :)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message