lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: 4.x Stories to be picked up
Date Tue, 06 Jan 2015 04:37:02 GMT
It is an overkill. What did they use asm for? All you need to port
Expressions is Antlr really

--

Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yes the Java impl is using Antlr already, but they also used the asm
> library. That is where I'm debating whether to use Expression trees or go
> for Roslyn. The latter looks like a bit of overkill though
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, the tokenizer implementations
> >
> > --
> >
> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Ah, I thought there was some place they were using another parser
> > > generator, but in the case of Antlr grammar already there, have at it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Paul Irwin
> > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > feature[23]
> > >
> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> itamar@code972.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > They are using Antlr for generating the Java bits there anyway..
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'd caution against reinventing the wheel on the parsing right now.
> > It
> > > > may
> > > > > be a faster path to just convert the generated java parsers into
C#
> > > using
> > > > > an automated tool, as I did on my earlier Lucene 4.3 porting so I
> can
> > > > > attest to it. I was able to validate that they parsed correctly and
> > > even
> > > > > used that ported code in a production app. Rewriting a parser may
> not
> > > be
> > > > > the best use of time right now -- although I can certainly see the
> > > value
> > > > in
> > > > > doing so later on.
> > > > >
> > > > > You can use my little utility to convert the syntax of entire files
> > at
> > > > > once: https://github.com/paulirwin/javatocsharp
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > feature[23]
> > > > >
> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <
> > hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Itamar and Laimonas. I appreciate the details and glad
to
> > help
> > > > . I
> > > > > > got started on Expressions and half way there. I'm using Antlr
> 4.3
> > > for
> > > > > the
> > > > > > parsing. Please let me know if that is what y'all were planning
> to
> > > use
> > > > > > anyway. I'll get to the index tests in core after that
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Hakeem, welcome on board!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Laimonas's response is spot on, let us know if you have
any
> > further
> > > > > > > questions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I personally don't have any preference - once we get to
0 test
> > > > failures
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > the core we will concentrate on finishing porting the rest
of
> the
> > > > > > > sub-projects (Analysis.Common, Codecs, Suggest) with all
their
> > > tests,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > then porting more sub-projects.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So I guess pick whatever you think you'd enjoy most, just
make
> > sure
> > > > to
> > > > > > keep
> > > > > > > us in the loop!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > >
> > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <
> > > > hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I just joined this group and looking to offer some
help in
> > > updating
> > > > > > > Lucene
> > > > > > > > to 4.8. I briefly skimmed thru but could not find
any items
> > > related
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > 4.x work. I'd very much appreciate it if someone can
let me
> > know
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > process for picking up items to work on. I spent a
couple
> weeks
> > > > > > updating
> > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > outdated branch of Lucene, so trying to avoid that
mistake
> > again
> > > :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message