lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: Nuget packages & 3rd party libs
Date Wed, 07 Jan 2015 03:13:34 GMT
It actually has, and I maintain it. There is currently an issue with strong
naming with a dependency of S4n that I need to solve..

--

Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Hakeem Mohammed <hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
wrote:

> The only add'l lib that I see in the lib folder is Spatial4n. I'm assuming
> it didn't have a nuget pkg. haven't checked though
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
> wrote:
>
> > That, and also we can mirror things on MyGet in the worst case. I have
> > already set up a feed for us there that we will use for publishing beta
> > packages.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Rob Vesse <rvesse@dotnetrdf.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Note that there is nothing stopping anyone packaging up an arbitrary
> DLL
> > > into a NuGet package and publishing it themselves if that is what is
> > > necessary to get an all NuGet build.  I've done this myself in the past
> > > for some of the more obscure dependencies I've needed in projects.
> > >
> > > However if you are using a dependency that isn't on NuGet these days
> that
> > > probably begs the question about whether said dependency is abandon
> ware
> > > and should be removed/replaced
> > >
> > > Rob
> > >
> > > On 06/01/2015 16:26, "Wyatt Barnett" <wyatt.barnett@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >I'm one of those who disagrees -- at least at this scale. We have
> very,
> > > >relatively small few dependencies here that are quite stable. They
> have
> > > >been in the git repo at some point so we are already paying freight.
> > > >
> > > >Personally I'd prefer the safer route of having the binaries locally
> and
> > > >not depending on nuget being up and nuget keeping whatever old
> > > >dependencies
> > > >we might have avaliable -- there is no SLA there that I'm aware of on
> > that
> > > >side of the world and I'm not sure what recourse we would have if
> there
> > > >were.
> > > >
> > > >That said it does appear nuget restore has been working well so I
> don't
> > > >see
> > > >why we can't proceed down this path.
> > > >
> > > >On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> There are those in the community that disagree with that approach
> > > >>though,
> > > >> so it isn't obvious to some. Just trying to clarify and determine
if
> > > >>that
> > > >> is our project's stance.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Paul Irwin
> > > >> Lead Software Engineer
> > > >> feature[23]
> > > >>
> > > >> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > itamar@code972.com
> > > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Obviously
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > >> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> > > >>wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Agreed with using Nuget as much as possible. I also prefer
not
> to
> > > >> commit
> > > >> > > binaries (like the packages folder) into the repo to reduce
> bloat.
> > > >>Yes,
> > > >> > it
> > > >> > > requires internet access to pull down the latest packages,
but
> > that
> > > >> beats
> > > >> > > having a gigantic repo to clone.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Paul Irwin
> > > >> > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > >> > > feature[23]
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >><itamar@code972.com
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > No, on the master branch we will be using nuget as
much as we
> > > >>can. If
> > > >> > you
> > > >> > > > can bring Antlr with nuget please do so.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > --
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > >> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <
> > > >> hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > So all 3rd party dlls go under a subfolder under
lib and
> > actual
> > > >> nuget
> > > >> > > > pkgs
> > > >> > > > > are not used. Is that correct?
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Apologies if this has been addressed before, I'm
new to the
> > > >>group
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Thanks!
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message