lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: Unecessary Paperwork
Date Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:43:03 GMT
Thanks Rob. Not a lawyer, thankfully, but always good to have a
knowledgeable person around.

We have actually voted Laimis in as a committer - being crazy busy myself
so left Prescott the honor of announcing that :)

--

Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Lucene.NET committer and PMC member

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Rob Vesse <rvesse@dotnetrdf.org> wrote:

> Itamar
>
> I notice you have been asking everyone to sign an ICLA before you'll
> accept any pull requests which is actually unnecessary.   ICLAs are only
> required for ASF committers (http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas) -
>
> "A signed CLA is required to be on file before an individual is given
> commit rights to an ASF project."
>
> The Apache License has a clause that explicitly covers contributions
> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0#contributions) so anything
> submitted through the formal channels to the project is a valid
> contribution unless the contributor explicitly states otherwise.  Of
> course a committer still has to merge and push the changes and the buck
> stops with the committer in terms of ensuring the IP of the contribution
> is clean.
>
> Of course ICLAs are still desirable particularly when people are making
> larger contributions but they should not block you from reviewing and
> accepting pull requests while you wait for one to be submitted
> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas):
>
> "The ASF desires that all contributors of ideas, code, or documentation to
> the Apache projects complete, sign, and submit (via postal mail, fax or
> email) an Individual Contributor License Agreement
> <http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt>"
>
> The key word being "desires", unless someone has commit rights to the
> project they don't require an ICLA since the Apache License already covers
> their contributions.
>
> Btw if the PMC isn't already you should be thinking about offering some of
> these folks who have been contributing for a while now committer rights.
> Note that giving people committer rights does not prevent you from keeping
> the projects existing pull request, review then commit workflow.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rob
>
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message