lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: Nuget packages & 3rd party libs
Date Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:29:06 GMT
So you are a on the agreeing side now, good :)

--

Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Wyatt Barnett <wyatt.barnett@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm one of those who disagrees -- at least at this scale. We have very,
> relatively small few dependencies here that are quite stable. They have
> been in the git repo at some point so we are already paying freight.
>
> Personally I'd prefer the safer route of having the binaries locally and
> not depending on nuget being up and nuget keeping whatever old dependencies
> we might have avaliable -- there is no SLA there that I'm aware of on that
> side of the world and I'm not sure what recourse we would have if there
> were.
>
> That said it does appear nuget restore has been working well so I don't see
> why we can't proceed down this path.
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com> wrote:
>
> > There are those in the community that disagree with that approach though,
> > so it isn't obvious to some. Just trying to clarify and determine if that
> > is our project's stance.
> >
> >
> > Paul Irwin
> > Lead Software Engineer
> > feature[23]
> >
> > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Obviously
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Agreed with using Nuget as much as possible. I also prefer not to
> > commit
> > > > binaries (like the packages folder) into the repo to reduce bloat.
> Yes,
> > > it
> > > > requires internet access to pull down the latest packages, but that
> > beats
> > > > having a gigantic repo to clone.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > feature[23]
> > > >
> > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> itamar@code972.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > No, on the master branch we will be using nuget as much as we can.
> If
> > > you
> > > > > can bring Antlr with nuget please do so.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <
> > hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > So all 3rd party dlls go under a subfolder under lib and actual
> > nuget
> > > > > pkgs
> > > > > > are not used. Is that correct?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apologies if this has been addressed before, I'm new to the
group
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message