lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Irwin <pir...@feature23.com>
Subject Re: 4.x Stories to be picked up
Date Sun, 04 Jan 2015 16:19:57 GMT
Ah, I thought there was some place they were using another parser
generator, but in the case of Antlr grammar already there, have at it.


Paul Irwin
Lead Software Engineer
feature[23]

Email: pirwin@feature23.com
Cell: 863-698-9294

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
wrote:

> They are using Antlr for generating the Java bits there anyway..
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com> wrote:
>
> > I'd caution against reinventing the wheel on the parsing right now. It
> may
> > be a faster path to just convert the generated java parsers into C# using
> > an automated tool, as I did on my earlier Lucene 4.3 porting so I can
> > attest to it. I was able to validate that they parsed correctly and even
> > used that ported code in a production app. Rewriting a parser may not be
> > the best use of time right now -- although I can certainly see the value
> in
> > doing so later on.
> >
> > You can use my little utility to convert the syntax of entire files at
> > once: https://github.com/paulirwin/javatocsharp
> >
> >
> > Paul Irwin
> > Lead Software Engineer
> > feature[23]
> >
> > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Itamar and Laimonas. I appreciate the details and glad to help
> . I
> > > got started on Expressions and half way there. I'm using Antlr 4.3 for
> > the
> > > parsing. Please let me know if that is what y'all were planning to use
> > > anyway. I'll get to the index tests in core after that
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Hakeem, welcome on board!
> > > >
> > > > Laimonas's response is spot on, let us know if you have any further
> > > > questions.
> > > >
> > > > I personally don't have any preference - once we get to 0 test
> failures
> > > in
> > > > the core we will concentrate on finishing porting the rest of the
> > > > sub-projects (Analysis.Common, Codecs, Suggest) with all their tests,
> > and
> > > > then porting more sub-projects.
> > > >
> > > > So I guess pick whatever you think you'd enjoy most, just make sure
> to
> > > keep
> > > > us in the loop!
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <
> hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I just joined this group and looking to offer some help in updating
> > > > Lucene
> > > > > to 4.8. I briefly skimmed thru but could not find any items related
> > to
> > > > the
> > > > > 4.x work. I'd very much appreciate it if someone can let me know
> the
> > > > > process for picking up items to work on. I spent a couple weeks
> > > updating
> > > > an
> > > > > outdated branch of Lucene, so trying to avoid that mistake again
:)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message