lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Irwin <pir...@feature23.com>
Subject Re: 4.x Stories to be picked up
Date Sun, 04 Jan 2015 16:07:22 GMT
Actually we might want to check to see if the grammars are the same between
4.3 and 4.8, and if so, we can just use the code from the branch_4x branch.


Paul Irwin
Lead Software Engineer
feature[23]

Email: pirwin@feature23.com
Cell: 863-698-9294

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com> wrote:

> I'd caution against reinventing the wheel on the parsing right now. It may
> be a faster path to just convert the generated java parsers into C# using
> an automated tool, as I did on my earlier Lucene 4.3 porting so I can
> attest to it. I was able to validate that they parsed correctly and even
> used that ported code in a production app. Rewriting a parser may not be
> the best use of time right now -- although I can certainly see the value in
> doing so later on.
>
> You can use my little utility to convert the syntax of entire files at
> once: https://github.com/paulirwin/javatocsharp
>
>
> Paul Irwin
> Lead Software Engineer
> feature[23]
>
> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> Cell: 863-698-9294
>
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Itamar and Laimonas. I appreciate the details and glad to help . I
>> got started on Expressions and half way there. I'm using Antlr 4.3 for the
>> parsing. Please let me know if that is what y'all were planning to use
>> anyway. I'll get to the index tests in core after that
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Hakeem, welcome on board!
>> >
>> > Laimonas's response is spot on, let us know if you have any further
>> > questions.
>> >
>> > I personally don't have any preference - once we get to 0 test failures
>> in
>> > the core we will concentrate on finishing porting the rest of the
>> > sub-projects (Analysis.Common, Codecs, Suggest) with all their tests,
>> and
>> > then porting more sub-projects.
>> >
>> > So I guess pick whatever you think you'd enjoy most, just make sure to
>> keep
>> > us in the loop!
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <hakeemosrc@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > I just joined this group and looking to offer some help in updating
>> > Lucene
>> > > to 4.8. I briefly skimmed thru but could not find any items related to
>> > the
>> > > 4.x work. I'd very much appreciate it if someone can let me know the
>> > > process for picking up items to work on. I spent a couple weeks
>> updating
>> > an
>> > > outdated branch of Lucene, so trying to avoid that mistake again :)
>> > >
>> > > Thanks!
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message