lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mohit Thakral ...@mohitt.com>
Subject Re: Unecessary Paperwork
Date Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:53:07 GMT
Itamar So, I suppose, I dont have to send ICLA now right ??

Regards
Mohit Thakral

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
wrote:

> C'mon, he deserves his own thread at least
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Lucene.NET committer and PMC member
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Er. Updated the Board - but
> > Yeah, Please welcome Laimis as our newest committer as of Jan 5th I
> > believe :)
> > ~P
> >
> > > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:43:03 +0200
> > > Subject: Re: Unecessary Paperwork
> > > From: itamar@code972.com
> > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > >
> > > Thanks Rob. Not a lawyer, thankfully, but always good to have a
> > > knowledgeable person around.
> > >
> > > We have actually voted Laimis in as a committer - being crazy busy
> myself
> > > so left Prescott the honor of announcing that :)
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > Lucene.NET committer and PMC member
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Rob Vesse <rvesse@dotnetrdf.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Itamar
> > > >
> > > > I notice you have been asking everyone to sign an ICLA before you'll
> > > > accept any pull requests which is actually unnecessary.   ICLAs are
> > only
> > > > required for ASF committers (http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas) -
> > > >
> > > > "A signed CLA is required to be on file before an individual is given
> > > > commit rights to an ASF project."
> > > >
> > > > The Apache License has a clause that explicitly covers contributions
> > > > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0#contributions) so
> anything
> > > > submitted through the formal channels to the project is a valid
> > > > contribution unless the contributor explicitly states otherwise.  Of
> > > > course a committer still has to merge and push the changes and the
> buck
> > > > stops with the committer in terms of ensuring the IP of the
> > contribution
> > > > is clean.
> > > >
> > > > Of course ICLAs are still desirable particularly when people are
> making
> > > > larger contributions but they should not block you from reviewing and
> > > > accepting pull requests while you wait for one to be submitted
> > > > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas):
> > > >
> > > > "The ASF desires that all contributors of ideas, code, or
> > documentation to
> > > > the Apache projects complete, sign, and submit (via postal mail, fax
> or
> > > > email) an Individual Contributor License Agreement
> > > > <http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt>"
> > > >
> > > > The key word being "desires", unless someone has commit rights to the
> > > > project they don't require an ICLA since the Apache License already
> > covers
> > > > their contributions.
> > > >
> > > > Btw if the PMC isn't already you should be thinking about offering
> > some of
> > > > these folks who have been contributing for a while now committer
> > rights.
> > > > Note that giving people committer rights does not prevent you from
> > keeping
> > > > the projects existing pull request, review then commit workflow.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Rob
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message