lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: Setting up the CI pipeline
Date Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:56:22 GMT
Don't forget to stick a reason to the Ignore property tho!

--

Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
wrote:

> Or just Skip (or Ignore, however that's called in NUnit) :)
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Wyatt Barnett <wyatt.barnett@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> 5 minutes sounds like a reasonable going in proposition. That said
>> depending on how many of these there are there might well be a *lot* of 5
>> minute waits.
>>
>> Would it help if I just stuck Assert.Fails() where I run into these loops
>> for the folks smarter than I to run down?
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > 5 mins max for one test maybe?
>> >
>> > To fix that infinite loop we need to revisit the original Java code,
>> most
>> > likely its porting of an iterator-style code that went wrong. I hope to
>> > have time to look at it next week, please anyone else who feels like it
>> > beat me to it..
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Wyatt Barnett <
>> wyatt.barnett@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > So, after the 2nd day of watching the tests just spin I decided that a
>> > > little visibility might make sense as something just was not adding up
>> > -- I
>> > > expected some failing tests, and some long-running tests but there
>> just
>> > > ain't enough data here to keep something running for 8+ hours.
>> > >
>> > > Anyhow, I stood up VS and the debugger and started looking into things
>> > and
>> > > I found that I was hitting at least one infiinte loop dealing with
>> > > randomized values -- specifically at
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/blob/master/src/Lucene.Net.TestFramework/Index/BasePostingsFormatTestCase.cs#L394
>> > > ;
>> > >
>> > > Anyhow, I'm not sure how to proceed here as if we want test automation
>> > the
>> > > tests need to run through in a reasonable amount of time but I don't
>> know
>> > > enough about the project to know what should run or not. One thought
>> > would
>> > > be to use nunit timeout attributes (
>> > > http://www.nunit.org/index.php?p=timeout&r=2.5) to constrain things.
>> If
>> > so
>> > > what is a reasonable timeout?
>> > >
>> > > I'm quite open to other, non kludgy thoughts too . . .
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Wyatt Barnett <
>> wyatt.barnett@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I looked over GitVersion -- looks like a great fit for this project
>> > > though
>> > > > it will require a bit of forethought about branching strategies.
>> > > >
>> > > > I'll take a run at getting it integrated once I get through the test
>> > > suite
>> > > > running successfully.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
>> > itamar@code972.com
>> > > >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Inline
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Wyatt Barnett <
>> > wyatt.barnett@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Thanks. I registered at CodeBetter.com under wwb. Is there
any
>> > > >> > documentation on their TeamCity setup or someone who I can
reach
>> out
>> > > to
>> > > >> > regarding questions about the build environment?
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I'm asking around, will let you know
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Thanks for the rundown -- things sound pretty straightforward
and
>> > > >> doable.
>> > > >> > One thing we'll need to think a bit a bout is how do we want
to
>> > manage
>> > > >> the
>> > > >> > git branching strategy to best integrate with TeamCity and
best
>> > > automate
>> > > >> > the release cycle. Doing things like constantly building
a
>> "trunk"
>> > and
>> > > >> > releasing based on tags are very doable.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Are you familiar with https://github.com/ParticularLabs/GitVersion
>> ?
>> > > I'll
>> > > >> be interested in adopting this to our process.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I've grabbed the code, looks like things are pretty clean
in
>> terms
>> > of
>> > > >> being
>> > > >> > able to build and run cleanly. One question --  I started
running
>> > the
>> > > >> test
>> > > >> > suite, it appears to execute about 80% successfully. I'm
>> presuming
>> > > this
>> > > >> is
>> > > >> > because we are still porting 4.8.0 here and is expected behavior.
>> > > Please
>> > > >> > confirm.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Yes, we still have some failing tests. The hope is to also utilize
>> > > >> TeamCity's reports to measure the affects of internal changes
we
>> make
>> > > >> faster.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I'll take a few stabs at a build cycle over the next few
days and
>> > see
>> > > >> what
>> > > >> > I can shake out.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thanks!
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
>> > > >> itamar@code972.com>
>> > > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > Thanks Wyatt
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Can you please register at http://teamcity.codebetter.com/
and
>> > send
>> > > >> me
>> > > >> > > your
>> > > >> > > user name (privately if you prefer)?
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Please use the master branch of our Apache git git://
>> > > >> > > git.apache.org/lucene.net.git - or the mirror at
>> > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/lucene.net (would rather you
use the
>> > > >> original
>> > > >> > > one
>> > > >> > > to avoid delays)
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > The way I see it is this:
>> > > >> > > * Lucene.Net.TestFramework compiles and generates a
nuget
>> package
>> > > >> > > * Lucene.Net.Core and Lucene.Net.Tests compiles, taking
>> dependency
>> > > on
>> > > >> > > Lucene.Net.TestFramework
>> > > >> > > * Lucene.Net.Tests is run and if successful versions
the build
>> and
>> > > >> > > generates nuget on the local feed (we also have a MyGet
>> account to
>> > > >> work
>> > > >> > > with)
>> > > >> > > * Same process to all sub-projects: Lucene.Net.Queries
for
>> > example:
>> > > >> > >   * Compile
>> > > >> > >   * Compile Lucene.Net.Tests.Queries
>> > > >> > >   * Run tests from Lucene.Net.Tests.Queries (take dependency
on
>> > > >> > > Lucene.Net.TestFramework)
>> > > >> > >   * Create nuget for Lucene.Net.Queries
>> > > >> > > * Every sub-project should be re-compiled and tests
re-run if
>> the
>> > > >> > projects
>> > > >> > > it depends on have changed (you can probably separate
the
>> cases by
>> > > >> > defining
>> > > >> > > watch folders under src\)
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > We can then iterate from there.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > I updated the README to explain the new structure
>> > > >> > >
>> https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/blob/master/README.md#files
>> > -
>> > > >> let
>> > > >> > me
>> > > >> > > know if you have any questions.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > --
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > >> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
>> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> > > >> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > > >> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Wyatt Barnett <
>> > > >> wyatt.barnett@gmail.com>
>> > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > That would be great -- let me know what I need
to do to help
>> > make
>> > > >> that
>> > > >> > > > happen.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > In the meantime I've got a teamcity server to work
with here,
>> > > >> should I
>> > > >> > be
>> > > >> > > > looking at
>> > > >> > > https://github.com/synhershko/lucene.net/tree/Lucene.Net_4.8.0
>> > > >> > > > as the project layout.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Also, what is envisioned for the output of the
build
>> pipeline?
>> > > Many
>> > > >> > > things
>> > > >> > > > are within the art of the possible.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Prescott Nasser
<
>> > > >> > geobmx540@hotmail.com>
>> > > >> > > > wrote:
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > > Would love the help setting this up - Itamar
do you know
>> if we
>> > > can
>> > > >> > > > provide
>> > > >> > > > > Wyatt access for this?
>> > > >> > > > > ________________________________
>> > > >> > > > > From: Wyatt Barnett<mailto:wyatt.barnett@gmail.com>
>> > > >> > > > > Sent: 11/14/2014 4:26 PM
>> > > >> > > > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org<mailto:
>> dev@lucenenet.apache.org>
>> > > >> > > > > Subject: Re: Setting up the CI pipeline
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > I do a lot of CI and CD and I've got loads
of seat time
>> with
>> > > >> > TeamCity,
>> > > >> > > I
>> > > >> > > > > would be happy to help the cause.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko
<
>> > > >> > > itamar@code972.com>
>> > > >> > > > > wrote:
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > Heya,
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > So JetBrains and CodeBetter have setup
a TeamCity account
>> > for
>> > > >> us -
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> http://teamcity.codebetter.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet&tab=projectOverview
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > I have asked them to add Prescott and
Troy as
>> collaborators,
>> > > so
>> > > >> we
>> > > >> > 3
>> > > >> > > > have
>> > > >> > > > > > access to change stuff there.
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > The idea is to have every sub-project
(Core, Codecs,
>> > Queries,
>> > > >> > Facets,
>> > > >> > > > > etc)
>> > > >> > > > > > compile and available as a nuget package,
and also
>> > thoroughly
>> > > >> > tested
>> > > >> > > > via
>> > > >> > > > > > the test agents on TeamCity.
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > Prescott, Troy - you said you can work
on setting this
>> up,
>> > > will
>> > > >> be
>> > > >> > > > happy
>> > > >> > > > > > for you to go ahead and do this now.
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > If there's anyone else on this list who
has experience
>> with
>> > > >> > TeamCity
>> > > >> > > > and
>> > > >> > > > > > setting up CI pipelines, please drop
us a line if you are
>> > > >> willing
>> > > >> > to
>> > > >> > > > help
>> > > >> > > > > > with this effort.
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > --
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > >> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
>> > > >> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> > > >> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > > >> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
>> http://manning.com/synhershko/
>> > >
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message