lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: Setting up the CI pipeline
Date Sat, 29 Nov 2014 16:35:11 GMT
PR merged, but not visible on github due to sync issues

--

Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com> wrote:

> https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/pull/25
>
> PR created for a number of fixes, including the Timeout attribute from
> Wyatt. I found a number of things that were causing tests to run forever.
> In particular, the use of DateTime.Now.Millisecond is incorrect and still
> exists in places -- I've been changing this to use DateTime comparisons
> instead.
>
>
> Paul Irwin
> Lead Software Engineer
> feature[23]
>
> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> Cell: 863-698-9294
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com> wrote:
>
> > For now I'm going to change the #if DEBUG call to be #if
> > VERBOSE_TEST_LOGGING so that you must opt-in to this painfully excessive
> > logging. I'll send a PR soon, with a few other things I found that are
> > causing tests to spin.
> >
> >
> > Paul Irwin
> > Lead Software Engineer
> > feature[23]
> >
> > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Yes - so if Wyatt can sort this out for us in a configurable way I'm
> >> personally going to buy him beers
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I think that would be a good idea for very useful logs - but in this
> >> case,
> >> > the logs only appear to be useful if you're diagnosing an issue. It
> >> would
> >> > be too verbose to log for every single CI test run (probably talking
> in
> >> the
> >> > MBs of logs just for this one test).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Paul Irwin
> >> > Lead Software Engineer
> >> > feature[23]
> >> >
> >> > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> itamar@code972.com
> >> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Better yet, how about:
> >> > >
> >> > > 1. Replacing all Console.WriteLine with logger.WriteLine - but set
> it
> >> up
> >> > so
> >> > > output does show up on TeamCity's output AND VisualStudio's Output
> >> > window?
> >> > > this way we can get far better logs on demand.
> >> > >
> >> > > 2. In the CI server, have the VERBOSE and DEBUG settings tunable for
> >> when
> >> > > we do want to run tests and get the logs for further inspections
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > >
> >> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I think I found the issue with the tests taking forever to run.
> >> > > > TestDoubleMockGraphTokenFilterRandom was running seemingly
> >> indefinitely
> >> > > --
> >> > > > I don't actually think now that it would run indefinitely, I just
> >> > didn't
> >> > > > feel like waiting on it after a good number of minutes.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I noticed a strange behavior when I was stepping through the test
> to
> >> > see
> >> > > > what was going on -- the console output would catch up every few
> >> times
> >> > > I'd
> >> > > > step over a statement, as if there were a background thread going
> >> on.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I do think there is some background thread issue, but it isn't
> with
> >> the
> >> > > > Lucene.net code (as far as I can tell) -- it appears to be with
> >> NUnit
> >> > > > itself or perhaps the VS test framework. But since it happened on
> >> the
> >> > CI
> >> > > > server too, I'm leaning towards NUnit.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > What I actually think is happening is that the Console output is
> >> > handled
> >> > > > asynchronously in some background thread, and there's just *so
> much*
> >> > > > logging
> >> > > > happening in the LookaheadTokenFilter et al that when DEBUG
> >> evaluates
> >> > to
> >> > > > true and the Console.WriteLine calls stack up, it takes forever to
> >> get
> >> > > > through them all. Running the tests in Release mode (when the
> >> > > > Console.WriteLine is not called) or manually setting DEBUG and
> >> VERBOSE
> >> > to
> >> > > > evaluate to false even in Debug configuration, causes the test to
> >> pass
> >> > in
> >> > > > 15 seconds on my machine.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Wyatt, can you try running the build and tests in Release mode and
> >> see
> >> > if
> >> > > > it runs better for you? We might also be able to get through this
> by
> >> > > > reducing the logging by commenting out the Console.WriteLine
> calls.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Paul Irwin
> >> > > > Lead Software Engineer
> >> > > > feature[23]
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> >> > itamar@code972.com>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Please do.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Send a ICLA to secretary@apache and send us a PR, I'll take
> care
> >> of
> >> > > > > merging
> >> > > > > it
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks!
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Wyatt Barnett <
> >> > > wyatt.barnett@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > So, after fighting a number of teething problems -- many of
> them
> >> > self
> >> > > > > > inflicted -- I've got a solid, repeatable test run that
> >> finishes in
> >> > > 38
> >> > > > > > minutes or so on our hardware.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I can certainly reprise this setup over on
> >> teamcity.codebetter.com
> >> > > > > without
> >> > > > > > much effort. We will need to merge some changes into things
> >> before
> >> > > > > > proceeding -- the current state of tests in the trunk will
> just
> >> > hang
> >> > > if
> >> > > > > we
> >> > > > > > tried to run them there. I'm guessing I'll need to sign a
> >> > > contributing
> >> > > > > > agreement here as I don't believe I filed one.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Wyatt Barnett <
> >> > > > wyatt.barnett@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Sounds good, we'll be [Explicit()] with reason.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> >> > > > > itamar@code972.com>
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> Yes, but Explicit() will help us isolate those issues from
> >> other
> >> > > > real
> >> > > > > > bugs
> >> > > > > > >> we can concentrate on solving in parallel.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> --
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> >> > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Wyatt Barnett <
> >> > > > > > wyatt.barnett@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > [Ignore()] is good too, I actually prefer a slightly
> >> nuanced
> >> > > > version
> >> > > > > > >> called
> >> > > > > > >> > [Explicit()] as that lets you still fire off the test
> from
> >> > > > resharper
> >> > > > > > or
> >> > > > > > >> > nunit gui.
> >> > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > That said I proposed Assert.Fail() here because we can
> put
> >> the
> >> > > > > failure
> >> > > > > > >> > point at the *exact* point where the folks should start
> >> > > debugging
> >> > > > > this
> >> > > > > > >> from
> >> > > > > > >> > versus having them start a at a whole test or test
> fixture.
> >> > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> >> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > Don't forget to stick a reason to the Ignore property
> >> tho!
> >> > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > --
> >> > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > >> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> >> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > > > > > >> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > >> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> >> http://manning.com/synhershko/
> >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> >> > > > > > >> itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > > Or just Skip (or Ignore, however that's called in
> >> NUnit)
> >> > :)
> >> > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > > --
> >> > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > >> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> >> > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > > > > > >> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > >> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> >> > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Wyatt Barnett <
> >> > > > > > >> > wyatt.barnett@gmail.com
> >> > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> 5 minutes sounds like a reasonable going in
> >> proposition.
> >> > > That
> >> > > > > > said
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> depending on how many of these there are there might
> >> well
> >> > > be
> >> > > > a
> >> > > > > > >> *lot*
> >> > > > > > >> > of
> >> > > > > > >> > > 5
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> minute waits.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> Would it help if I just stuck Assert.Fails() where I
> >> run
> >> > > into
> >> > > > > > these
> >> > > > > > >> > > loops
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> for the folks smarter than I to run down?
> >> > > > > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko
> <
> >> > > > > > >> > itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > 5 mins max for one test maybe?
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > To fix that infinite loop we need to revisit the
> >> > original
> >> > > > > Java
> >> > > > > > >> code,
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> most
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > likely its porting of an iterator-style code that
> >> went
> >> > > > > wrong. I
> >> > > > > > >> hope
> >> > > > > > >> > > to
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > have time to look at it next week, please anyone
> >> else
> >> > who
> >> > > > > feels
> >> > > > > > >> like
> >> > > > > > >> > > it
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > beat me to it..
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > --
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> >> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> >> > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> >> > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Wyatt Barnett <
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> wyatt.barnett@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > So, after the 2nd day of watching the tests just
> >> > spin I
> >> > > > > > decided
> >> > > > > > >> > > that a
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > little visibility might make sense as something
> >> just
> >> > > was
> >> > > > > not
> >> > > > > > >> > adding
> >> > > > > > >> > > up
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > -- I
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > expected some failing tests, and some
> long-running
> >> > > tests
> >> > > > > but
> >> > > > > > >> there
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> just
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > ain't enough data here to keep something running
> >> for
> >> > 8+
> >> > > > > > hours.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > Anyhow, I stood up VS and the debugger and
> started
> >> > > > looking
> >> > > > > > into
> >> > > > > > >> > > things
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > and
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > I found that I was hitting at least one infiinte
> >> loop
> >> > > > > dealing
> >> > > > > > >> with
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > randomized values -- specifically at
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/blob/master/src/Lucene.Net.TestFramework/Index/BasePostingsFormatTestCase.cs#L394
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > ;
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > Anyhow, I'm not sure how to proceed here as if
> we
> >> > want
> >> > > > test
> >> > > > > > >> > > automation
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > the
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > tests need to run through in a reasonable amount
> >> of
> >> > > time
> >> > > > > but
> >> > > > > > I
> >> > > > > > >> > don't
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> know
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > enough about the project to know what should run
> >> or
> >> > > not.
> >> > > > > One
> >> > > > > > >> > thought
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > would
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > be to use nunit timeout attributes (
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > http://www.nunit.org/index.php?p=timeout&r=2.5)
> >> to
> >> > > > > constrain
> >> > > > > > >> > > things.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> If
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > so
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > what is a reasonable timeout?
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > I'm quite open to other, non kludgy thoughts too
> >> . .
> >> > .
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Wyatt Barnett
> <
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> wyatt.barnett@gmail.com
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > I looked over GitVersion -- looks like a great
> >> fit
> >> > > for
> >> > > > > this
> >> > > > > > >> > > project
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > though
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > it will require a bit of forethought about
> >> > branching
> >> > > > > > >> strategies.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > I'll take a run at getting it integrated once
> I
> >> get
> >> > > > > through
> >> > > > > > >> the
> >> > > > > > >> > > test
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > suite
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > running successfully.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Itamar
> >> > Syn-Hershko
> >> > > <
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Inline
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> --
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> >> > > > > > >> > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> >> > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> >> > > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> >> > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Wyatt
> Barnett
> >> <
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > wyatt.barnett@gmail.com
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks. I registered at CodeBetter.com
> under
> >> > wwb.
> >> > > Is
> >> > > > > > there
> >> > > > > > >> > any
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > documentation on their TeamCity setup or
> >> someone
> >> > > > who I
> >> > > > > > can
> >> > > > > > >> > > reach
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> out
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > to
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > regarding questions about the build
> >> environment?
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> I'm asking around, will let you know
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks for the rundown -- things sound
> pretty
> >> > > > > > >> straightforward
> >> > > > > > >> > > and
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> doable.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > One thing we'll need to think a bit a bout
> is
> >> > how
> >> > > do
> >> > > > > we
> >> > > > > > >> want
> >> > > > > > >> > to
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > manage
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> the
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > git branching strategy to best integrate
> with
> >> > > > TeamCity
> >> > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > >> > best
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > automate
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > the release cycle. Doing things like
> >> constantly
> >> > > > > > building a
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> "trunk"
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > and
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > releasing based on tags are very doable.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Are you familiar with
> >> > > > > > >> > > https://github.com/ParticularLabs/GitVersion
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> ?
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > I'll
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> be interested in adopting this to our
> process.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > I've grabbed the code, looks like things
> are
> >> > > pretty
> >> > > > > > clean
> >> > > > > > >> in
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> terms
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > of
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> being
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > able to build and run cleanly. One question
> >> --
> >> > I
> >> > > > > > started
> >> > > > > > >> > > running
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > the
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> test
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > suite, it appears to execute about 80%
> >> > > successfully.
> >> > > > > I'm
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> presuming
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > this
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> is
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > because we are still porting 4.8.0 here and
> >> is
> >> > > > > expected
> >> > > > > > >> > > behavior.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > Please
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > confirm.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Yes, we still have some failing tests. The
> >> hope is
> >> > > to
> >> > > > > also
> >> > > > > > >> > > utilize
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> TeamCity's reports to measure the affects of
> >> > > internal
> >> > > > > > >> changes
> >> > > > > > >> > we
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> make
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> faster.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > I'll take a few stabs at a build cycle over
> >> the
> >> > > next
> >> > > > > few
> >> > > > > > >> days
> >> > > > > > >> > > and
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > see
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> what
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > I can shake out.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks!
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Itamar
> >> > > > Syn-Hershko <
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> itamar@code972.com>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks Wyatt
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Can you please register at
> >> > > > > > >> http://teamcity.codebetter.com/
> >> > > > > > >> > > and
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > send
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> me
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > your
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > user name (privately if you prefer)?
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Please use the master branch of our
> Apache
> >> git
> >> > > > > git://
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > git.apache.org/lucene.net.git - or the
> >> mirror
> >> > > at
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/lucene.net
> >> (would
> >> > > > rather
> >> > > > > > you
> >> > > > > > >> use
> >> > > > > > >> > > the
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> original
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > one
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > to avoid delays)
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > The way I see it is this:
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Lucene.Net.TestFramework compiles and
> >> > > generates
> >> > > > a
> >> > > > > > >> nuget
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> package
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Lucene.Net.Core and Lucene.Net.Tests
> >> > compiles,
> >> > > > > > taking
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> dependency
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > on
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Lucene.Net.TestFramework
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Lucene.Net.Tests is run and if
> successful
> >> > > > versions
> >> > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > >> > > build
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> and
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > generates nuget on the local feed (we
> also
> >> > have
> >> > > a
> >> > > > > > MyGet
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> account to
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> work
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > with)
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Same process to all sub-projects:
> >> > > > > Lucene.Net.Queries
> >> > > > > > >> for
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > example:
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >   * Compile
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >   * Compile Lucene.Net.Tests.Queries
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >   * Run tests from
> Lucene.Net.Tests.Queries
> >> > > (take
> >> > > > > > >> > dependency
> >> > > > > > >> > > on
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Lucene.Net.TestFramework)
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >   * Create nuget for Lucene.Net.Queries
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Every sub-project should be re-compiled
> >> and
> >> > > > tests
> >> > > > > > >> re-run
> >> > > > > > >> > if
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> the
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > projects
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > it depends on have changed (you can
> >> probably
> >> > > > > separate
> >> > > > > > >> the
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> cases by
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > defining
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > watch folders under src\)
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > We can then iterate from there.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > I updated the README to explain the new
> >> > > structure
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/blob/master/README.md#files
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > -
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> let
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > me
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > know if you have any questions.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > --
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> >> > > > > > >> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Wyatt
> >> > Barnett <
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> wyatt.barnett@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > That would be great -- let me know
> what I
> >> > need
> >> > > > to
> >> > > > > do
> >> > > > > > >> to
> >> > > > > > >> > > help
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > make
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> that
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > happen.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > In the meantime I've got a teamcity
> >> server
> >> > to
> >> > > > work
> >> > > > > > >> with
> >> > > > > > >> > > here,
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> should I
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > be
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > looking at
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > https://github.com/synhershko/lucene.net/tree/Lucene.Net_4.8.0
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > as the project layout.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Also, what is envisioned for the output
> >> of
> >> > the
> >> > > > > build
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> pipeline?
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > Many
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > things
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > are within the art of the possible.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:08 PM,
> Prescott
> >> > > > Nasser <
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > geobmx540@hotmail.com>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > Would love the help setting this up -
> >> > Itamar
> >> > > > do
> >> > > > > > you
> >> > > > > > >> > know
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> if we
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > can
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > provide
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > Wyatt access for this?
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > ________________________________
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > From: Wyatt Barnett<mailto:
> >> > > > > > wyatt.barnett@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > Sent: 11/14/2014 4:26 PM
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org<mailto:
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> dev@lucenenet.apache.org>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > Subject: Re: Setting up the CI
> pipeline
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > I do a lot of CI and CD and I've got
> >> loads
> >> > > of
> >> > > > > seat
> >> > > > > > >> time
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> with
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > TeamCity,
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > I
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > would be happy to help the cause.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:49 AM,
> Itamar
> >> > > > > > Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > >> <
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > itamar@code972.com>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Heya,
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > So JetBrains and CodeBetter have
> >> setup a
> >> > > > > > TeamCity
> >> > > > > > >> > > account
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > for
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> us -
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://teamcity.codebetter.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet&tab=projectOverview
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > I have asked them to add Prescott
> and
> >> > Troy
> >> > > > as
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> collaborators,
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > so
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> we
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > 3
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > have
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > access to change stuff there.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > The idea is to have every
> sub-project
> >> > > (Core,
> >> > > > > > >> Codecs,
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > Queries,
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > Facets,
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > etc)
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > compile and available as a nuget
> >> > package,
> >> > > > and
> >> > > > > > also
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > thoroughly
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > tested
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > via
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > the test agents on TeamCity.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Prescott, Troy - you said you can
> >> work
> >> > on
> >> > > > > > setting
> >> > > > > > >> > this
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> up,
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > will
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> be
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > happy
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > for you to go ahead and do this
> now.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > If there's anyone else on this list
> >> who
> >> > > has
> >> > > > > > >> > experience
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> with
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > TeamCity
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > and
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > setting up CI pipelines, please
> drop
> >> us
> >> > a
> >> > > > line
> >> > > > > > if
> >> > > > > > >> you
> >> > > > > > >> > > are
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> willing
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > to
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > help
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > with this effort.
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> http://manning.com/synhershko/
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message