lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: Which tests to fix first
Date Wed, 10 Sep 2014 01:35:21 GMT
I'm about to commit some serious changes - please make sure you pull
frequently (I will advise using git rebase...)

--

Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:25 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
wrote:

> See http://markmail.org/message/3zkh5qqdw7gxttea
>
> I think starting with Utils is a good idea, the next item is probably
> going to be all the tests under Store
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Prad Nelluru <prnell@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> We have a significant number of unit tests that are failing. What should
>> be the priority order we assign to the various test groups? My first look
>> says to start with the Util tests, since these are data structures and
>> algorithms that are widely used in the remaining tests. What do you all
>> think?
>>
>> If anyone is going to help with fixing the tests, let me know so we can
>> coordinate our changes.
>>
>> Best,
>> -Prad
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message