lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Svensson <si...@devhost.se>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Removing strong naming from all future versions
Date Thu, 01 May 2014 12:57:03 GMT
+1

(I'll admit that I had no idea that I had any voting power...)

On 01/05/14 14:33, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
> Ok so we have 4 binding votes in favor to this move (counting Paul as well
> because of his recent contributions), 1 non-binding in favor, and 2
> non-binding against it.
>
> Michael and Simon's votes are still absent but that won't matter anyway.
>
> I haven't announced a deadline initially so I'll be setting one now. Vote
> terminates May 2nd 2PM GMT, just a bit over 24h from now.
>
> We will then move to making the mentioned changes.
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Nicholas Paldino <casperOne@caspershouse.com
>> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>>> On Apr 30, 2014, at 6:38 PM, "Troy Howard" <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 since we will make both available
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: "Paul Irwin" <pirwin@feature23.com>
>>>> Sent: ‎4/‎29/‎2014 7:06 AM
>>>> To: "dev@lucenenet.apache.org" <dev@lucenenet.apache.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Removing strong naming from all future versions
>>>>
>>>> +1 since an alternative signed version would be available as a download.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>>
>>>>> All reasoning are here:
>>>>>
>> http://code972.com/blog/2014/04/68-ditching-strong-naming-for-lucene-net
>>>>> We will publish both signed and non-signed. If someone can't change
>> their
>>>>> process for making their project not sign, they are most likely not
>> using
>>>>> nuget anyway. May be a bit harsh but that's mostly true.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
>>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Rob Vesse <rvesse@dotnetrdf.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am strongly in favour of keeping strong naming for previously
>>>> mentioned
>>>>>> reasons, I believe removing the signing will cause issues throughout
>>>> the
>>>>>> wider ecosystem of developers who rely on Lucene.Net
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Counter-proposal:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Publish both signed and unsigned packages and leave it up to users
to
>>>>>> decide which to use, the main package IDs should continue to be signed
>>>>> and
>>>>>> new package IDs should be created for the unsigned variants
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rob
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 29/04/2014 03:52, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <itamar@code972.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>> This is a vote for removing strong naming from Lucene.NET effective
>>>>>>> immediately, affecting all future versions including the planned
v3
>>>>> bugfix
>>>>>>> release and obviously the v4 branch, arguments being:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. This is a headache to manage, given dependencies may or may
not be
>>>>>>> signed and as long as we are signed we can't use them without
signing
>>>>> them
>>>>>>> first. At this point in time it's a blocker for us from releasing
the
>>>> v3
>>>>>>> bugfix version.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. Strong naming is pretty much pointless as it is anyway, especially
>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>> we are OSS and our key is public anyway.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All main distribution channels (nuget, binary downloads) will
not be
>>>>>>> signed, but we will provide a download link with a signed version
for
>>>>>>> people who need a signed. This is to address needs coming from
people
>>>>> who
>>>>>>> already have signed their projects.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We will also publish a Wiki page describing this move in detail,
with
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> hopes people will remove signing from their projects instead
of using
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> signed version.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's make the world a better place.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>>>>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>>>>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
>>>>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Paul Irwin
>>>> Lead Software Engineer
>>>> feature[23]
>>>>
>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
>>>>


Mime
View raw message