lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From michael herndon <mhern...@michaelherndon.com>
Subject Re: Lucene.net 4?
Date Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:34:49 GMT
Lucene.Net has a history of working on mono, which is one of the reasons
NUnit is still used. Does xUnit work on Mono consistently yet?

While the carrot test randomizer also runs the tests in random order and
provides random generated values, I think the real point of it being used
is to log stack information and seed information so that when a randomized
test fails, the failure can be reproduced and repeated.

One of the problems of the Lucene test suite in the past is that tests
would randomly fail, but it was hard to figure to out the cause.

-M


On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>wrote:

> I'd say we are at a stage where restructuring makes sense even if it delays
> shipping the next version, if it will help us keep up with future versions
> faster in the future.
>
> There are solutions for randomized testing in .NET which don't involve
> porting more stuff from Java. As far as I'm concerned we can even switch to
> xUnit.NET if it makes more sense.
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:30 AM, michael herndon <
> mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > wrote:
>
> > The test framework needs to be completed first.  It looks likes the test
> > framework is making using of external junit addins
> >
> > Parts of following libraries may need to be ported and nunit extended .
> > https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting  (Apache 2.0)
> > https://github.com/ferstl/junit-testgroups  (Mit)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, michael herndon <
> > mherndon@michaelherndon.com> wrote:
> >
> > > These items are good ideas and should be entered into Jira as some kind
> > of
> > > project meta task so that decisions can be tracked and prioritized.
> > >
> > > With a code base of this size, each project wide change like switching
> > > asserts comes at a cost and so does getting automation right.
> > >
> > > Is the primary goal of branch_4x to ship soon as possible? or is it to
> > > increase the sustainability of the project ?
> > >
> > > These goals are not mutually exclusive. However, it is easier to
> > > prioritize work items if there is some primary goal or agreed upon
> > > prioritization of goals.
> > >
> > > -----------
> > >
> > > I'll start with getting the core test library and test framework to
> > > compile and making it obvious which classes need to be converted /
> > updated.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I'll let someone else drive that... haha
> > >>
> > >> I am not a R# user. But I did put all the logic for doing the syntax
> > >> conversion in a separate library in that repo, so it should be
> > relatively
> > >> easy to take that and add to a plugin, I would guess.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> itamar@code972.com
> > >> >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Cool, then I'll look into that. Any chance you can make it a R#
> > plugin?
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > >> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a syntactic
> > >> > > conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It
does
> > not
> > >> > > resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit faster
> than
> > >> > doing
> > >> > > the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > >> itamar@code972.com
> > >> > > >wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its
a
> waste
> > >> of
> > >> > > time
> > >> > > > to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be
doing
> is
> > >> > > > copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing
import
> > >> with
> > >> > > > using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could automate
> > that
> > >> > > could
> > >> > > > be great) and the rest should just compile and work because
the
> > >> tests
> > >> > > > framework already supports most of what happens there.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > >> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <
> pirwin@feature23.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick
Java to
> C#
> > >> > > converter
> > >> > > > > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support.
It uses
> > >> Roslyn
> > >> > > for
> > >> > > > > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later
porting
> > work.
> > >> > It's
> > >> > > > far
> > >> > > > > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly.
> It
> > >> warns
> > >> > > you
> > >> > > > > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> > >> > > > > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Maybe that will help?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko
<
> > >> > > itamar@code972.com
> > >> > > > > >wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > +1
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing
> framework
> > >> for
> > >> > > > > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly
copy-pasted
> > and
> > >> > just
> > >> > > > > run.
> > >> > > > > > That'd probably involve many extension method
and a smart
> base
> > >> > class
> > >> > > > that
> > >> > > > > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or
asserts into
> > >> their C#
> > >> > > > > > equivalents.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with
.NET
> > >> standards, I
> > >> > > see
> > >> > > > > no
> > >> > > > > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't
got around
> to
> > >> doing
> > >> > > it
> > >> > > > > yet.
> > >> > > > > > Will be happy to help tho.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > >> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > >> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > >> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/
> >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon
<
> > >> > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working
towards
> getting
> > >> the
> > >> > > > tests
> > >> > > > > > to a
> > >> > > > > > > state where they compile and pass, but I
don't want to
> > >> duplicate
> > >> > > work
> > >> > > > > > > either.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > If the the tests are not currently being
worked on, then
> > I'll
> > >> go
> > >> > > > ahead
> > >> > > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > > start working on getting the the Core test
library into a
> > >> state
> > >> > > that
> > >> > > > it
> > >> > > > > > can
> > >> > > > > > > be compiled and run tests.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin
<
> > >> pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon,
maybe even today.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael
herndon <
> > >> > > > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > Is any one working on the tests
in branch_4x for core
> at
> > >> the
> > >> > > > > moment?
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM,
Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > >> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion
in the mailing list. Keep
> > >> pushing
> > >> > > > > commits
> > >> > > > > > > to
> > >> > > > > > > > > your
> > >> > > > > > > > > > branch, and when you fill
it is ready to be merged
> let
> > >> us
> > >> > > know.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > > > > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko
<
> > >> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Freelance Developer &
Consultant
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action
<
> > >> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33
AM, Jude Bowman <
> > >> > > judebo@gmail.com
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback.
 I added a Jira task
> > for
> > >> > this
> > >> > > > > work:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > I will keep emailing
Paul my commit's so that they
> > >> can be
> > >> > > > > merged
> > >> > > > > > > into
> > >> > > > > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > branch.  Please let me
know if I should change the
> > >> way I
> > >> > am
> > >> > > > > doing
> > >> > > > > > > > > > anything
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > or any other feedback
that may be helpful.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at
5:27 PM, Itamar
> Syn-Hershko <
> > >> > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Please try to commit
more often...
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting
an effort on this
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> --
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> http://code972.com
| @synhershko <
> > >> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer
& Consultant
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB
in Action <
> > >> > > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014
at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> In order to keep
moving along, I decided to halt
> > the
> > >> > > work I
> > >> > > > > was
> > >> > > > > > > > doing
> > >> > > > > > > > > > in
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started
adding classes to
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\"
folder
> to
> > >> match
> > >> > > > what
> > >> > > > > is
> > >> > > > > > > in
> > >> > > > > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3"
Java branch.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit
with a lot of new classes added
> > as
> > >> > well
> > >> > > > as a
> > >> > > > > > few
> > >> > > > > > > > > other
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> changes needed
to work in Miscellaneous.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable
to commit more often with fine
> > >> grain,
> > >> > or
> > >> > > > is
> > >> > > > > > > what I
> > >> > > > > > > > > did
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> fine where I
have a commit with a lot of
> changes?
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22,
2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Sure.  I
stated by looking at the Java version
> > from
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> branch. located
at
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I basically
was attempting to
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid
of all the build errors in the
> classes
> > >> that
> > >> > > > > already
> > >> > > > > > > > > exist,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove
the classes/files (such as the
> > >> Spatial\BBox
> > >> > > > > > > > subdirectory)
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> that do not
exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the
new classes that are in the Java 4.3
> > >> > version
> > >> > > > that
> > >> > > > > > do
> > >> > > > > > > > not
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> exist in
the .NET version yet.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I was not
aware of spatial4j/spatial4n
> component
> > of
> > >> > this
> > >> > > > > > > project.
> > >> > > > > > > > >  Is
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> mirroring
the code in the above Java 4.3 branch
> > not
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > > > correct
> > >> > > > > > > > > thing
> > >> > > > > > > > > > to be
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> doing for
this Spatial project?
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> If I did
pick too hard of a task to start
> with, I
> > >> do
> > >> > not
> > >> > > > > mind
> > >> > > > > > > > moving
> > >> > > > > > > > > > to
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> something
a little more simpler.  If you have
> any
> > >> > > > > > > > recommendations, I
> > >> > > > > > > > > > would
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> appreciate
it.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb
22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar
> > >> Syn-Hershko <
> > >> > > > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's
work using JIRA, as there's always some
> > >> form of
> > >> > > > > > > discussion
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> required.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jude,
can you please describe what you did
> > there?
> > >> The
> > >> > > > > spatial
> > >> > > > > > > > > module
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs
to be brought in line with the latest
> > >> spatial4j
> > >> > > > (see
> > >> > > > > > > > > > spatial4n, which
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs
to be brought up to date as well) and
> the
> > >> > Spatial
> > >> > > > > > module
> > >> > > > > > > > > > there. There
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> have
been a lot of API changes there. I think
> > you
> > >> > > picked
> > >> > > > > > quite
> > >> > > > > > > a
> > >> > > > > > > > > > tough task
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> as your
first...
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> --
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar
Syn-Hershko
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com
| @synhershko <
> > >> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance
Developer & Consultant
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Author
of RavenDB in Action <
> > >> > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun,
Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > >> > > > > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks
for getting going on this! No we do
> not
> > >> use
> > >> > > pull
> > >> > > > > > > requests
> > >> > > > > > > > > on
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub
currently. Once you're ready for
> > >> something to
> > >> > > go
> > >> > > > > > > > upstream,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > let me
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> know
and I can pull from your fork and push
> it
> > >> up.
> > >> > > > > > Eventually
> > >> > > > > > > we
> > >> > > > > > > > > > can get
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> you
commit access if you make enough progress
> > to
> > >> > make
> > >> > > it
> > >> > > > > > > > > > worthwhile. We
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't
yet been using Jira for any of the
> 4.x
> > >> work
> > >> > > as I
> > >> > > > > > don't
> > >> > > > > > > > > > think it's
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite
to that stage of needing tickets for
> > >> issues.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On
Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman
> <
> > >> > > > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
I started by working in the Contrib.Spatial
> > >> project
> > >> > > and
> > >> > > > > > made
> > >> > > > > > > a
> > >> > > > > > > > > lot
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
of progress to get the number of build
> errors
> > >> down.
> > >> > > >  From
> > >> > > > > > my
> > >> > > > > > > > > > public repo
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I
> > committed
> > >> > and
> > >> > > > then
> > >> > > > > > > sent
> > >> > > > > > > > a
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
Pull request through GitHub.  If it does not
> > >> show
> > >> > on
> > >> > > > your
> > >> > > > > > > end,
> > >> > > > > > > > or
> > >> > > > > > > > > > I did not
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
follow the correct steps to get changes to
> > you,
> > >> > > please
> > >> > > > > let
> > >> > > > > > me
> > >> > > > > > > > > know.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
Should I create a ticket in Jira to complete
> > the
> > >> > > > porting
> > >> > > > > of
> > >> > > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
Spatial project, and continue to work on
> that
> > >> until
> > >> > > it
> > >> > > > is
> > >> > > > > > > > > complete?
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
Thanks,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
Jude
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott
> > >> Nasser <
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
Jude -
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
Thanks for offering to help, right now we
> are
> > >> > > looking
> > >> > > > at
> > >> > > > > > > > porting
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
I believe the current process would be to
> > check
> > >> > out
> > >> > > > our
> > >> > > > > > > JIRA (
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET -
> > >> > > > right
> > >> > > > > > now
> > >> > > > > > > > > it's
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
pretty empty, so you might create a ticket
> > for
> > >> > your
> > >> > > > > > specific
> > >> > > > > > > > > > feature).
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
Using the page above and possibly Paul and
> > >> > Itamar's
> > >> > > > > help,
> > >> > > > > > > pick
> > >> > > > > > > > > > out a
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
feature, create your ticket for that
> feature,
> > >> and
> > >> > > then
> > >> > > > > > > create
> > >> > > > > > > > a
> > >> > > > > > > > > > pull
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
request.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for
> any
> > >> > > > > > contribuations
> > >> > > > > > > > you
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
make, just some paperwork. We can do that
> > when
> > >> a
> > >> > > pull
> > >> > > > > > > request
> > >> > > > > > > > > > comes in.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a
> > >> > specific
> > >> > > > > > feature
> > >> > > > > > > > > that
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
Jude could work on for us?
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
~P
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> I would love to contribute. I am a Sr.
> > >> Software
> > >> > > > > Engineer
> > >> > > > > > > who
> > >> > > > > > > > > is
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
currently
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never
> worked
> > >> on
> > >> > an
> > >> > > > open
> > >> > > > > > > > source
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
project but I
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> have been wanting to, so I am hoping this
> > >> would
> > >> > > be a
> > >> > > > > > good
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
oppertunity to do
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> so. Please contact me at
> > >> > jude_bowman@hotmail.comifI
> > >> > > > > > > would
> > >> > > > > > > > > be
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
eligible to
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> contribute.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> Thanks!
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> Jude
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul
Irwin
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead
Software Engineer
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Email:
pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell:
863-698-9294
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Paul Irwin
> > >> > > > > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > >> > > > > > > > feature[23]
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> > > > > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > --
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Paul Irwin
> > >> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > >> > > > > feature[23]
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Paul Irwin
> > >> > > Lead Software Engineer
> > >> > > feature[23]
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Paul Irwin
> > >> Lead Software Engineer
> > >> feature[23]
> > >>
> > >> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > >> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message