# lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

##### Site index · List index
Message view
Top
From michael herndon <mhern...@michaelherndon.com>
Subject Re: Lucene.net 4?
Date Fri, 07 Mar 2014 02:30:26 GMT
```The test framework needs to be completed first.  It looks likes the test
framework is making using of external junit addins

Parts of following libraries may need to be ported and nunit extended .
https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting  (Apache 2.0)
https://github.com/ferstl/junit-testgroups  (Mit)

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, michael herndon <
mherndon@michaelherndon.com> wrote:

> These items are good ideas and should be entered into Jira as some kind of
> project meta task so that decisions can be tracked and prioritized.
>
> With a code base of this size, each project wide change like switching
> asserts comes at a cost and so does getting automation right.
>
> Is the primary goal of branch_4x to ship soon as possible? or is it to
> increase the sustainability of the project ?
>
> These goals are not mutually exclusive. However, it is easier to
> prioritize work items if there is some primary goal or agreed upon
> prioritization of goals.
>
> -----------
>
> I'll start with getting the core test library and test framework to
> compile and making it obvious which classes need to be converted / updated.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll let someone else drive that... haha
>>
>> I am not a R# user. But I did put all the logic for doing the syntax
>> conversion in a separate library in that repo, so it should be relatively
>> easy to take that and add to a plugin, I would guess.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Cool, then I'll look into that. Any chance you can make it a R# plugin?
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a syntactic
>> > > conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It does not
>> > > resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit faster than
>> > doing
>> > > the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
>> itamar@code972.com
>> > > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a waste
>> of
>> > > time
>> > > > to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be doing is
>> > > > copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing import
>> with
>> > > > using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could automate that
>> > > could
>> > > > be great) and the rest should just compile and work because the
>> tests
>> > > > framework already supports most of what happens there.
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > >
>> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java to
C#
>> > > converter
>> > > > > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It uses
>> Roslyn
>> > > for
>> > > > > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting work.
>> > It's
>> > > > far
>> > > > > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly.
It
>> warns
>> > > you
>> > > > > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
>> > > > > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Maybe that will help?
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
>> > > itamar@code972.com
>> > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > +1
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing framework
>> for
>> > > > > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly copy-pasted
and
>> > just
>> > > > > run.
>> > > > > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart
base
>> > class
>> > > > that
>> > > > > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into
>> their C#
>> > > > > > equivalents.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET
>> standards, I
>> > > see
>> > > > > no
>> > > > > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around
to
>> doing
>> > > it
>> > > > > yet.
>> > > > > > Will be happy to help tho.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
>> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
>> > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards
getting
>> the
>> > > > tests
>> > > > > > to a
>> > > > > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want
to
>> duplicate
>> > > work
>> > > > > > > either.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on,
then I'll
>> go
>> > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > start working on getting the the Core test library
into a
>> state
>> > > that
>> > > > it
>> > > > > > can
>> > > > > > > be compiled and run tests.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <
>> pirwin@feature23.com
>> > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even
today.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon
<
>> > > > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x
for core at
>> the
>> > > > > moment?
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko
<
>> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
>> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing
list. Keep
>> pushing
>> > > > > commits
>> > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > your
>> > > > > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready
to be merged let
>> us
>> > > know.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > > > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > > > > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
>> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude
Bowman <
>> > > judebo@gmail.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback.  I
>> > this
>> > > > > work:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's
so that they
>> can be
>> > > > > merged
>> > > > > > > into
>> > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > branch.  Please let me know if
I should change the
>> way I
>> > am
>> > > > > doing
>> > > > > > > > > > anything
>> > > > > > > > > > > or any other feedback that may
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM,
Itamar Syn-Hershko <
>> > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
>> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort
on this
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> --
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > > > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko
<
>> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
>> > > > > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action
<
>> > > http://manning.com/synhershko/
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26
AM, Jude Bowman <
>> > > > > judebo@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving
along, I decided to halt the
>> > > work I
>> > > > > was
>> > > > > > > > doing
>> > > > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding
classes to
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\"
folder to
>> match
>> > > > what
>> > > > > is
>> > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java
branch.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a
lot of new classes added as
>> > well
>> > > > as a
>> > > > > > few
>> > > > > > > > > other
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> changes needed to work
in Miscellaneous.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit
more often with fine
>> grain,
>> > or
>> > > > is
>> > > > > > > what I
>> > > > > > > > > did
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit
with a lot of changes?
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at
5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <
>> > > > > judebo@gmail.com
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Sure.  I stated by
looking at the Java version from
>> > the
>> > > > > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting
to
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the
build errors in the classes
>> that
>> > > > > already
>> > > > > > > > > exist,
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files
(such as the
>> Spatial\BBox
>> > > > > > > > subdirectory)
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in
the 4.3 Java version,
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes
that are in the Java 4.3
>> > version
>> > > > that
>> > > > > > do
>> > > > > > > > not
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version
yet.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of
spatial4j/spatial4n component of
>> > this
>> > > > > > > project.
>> > > > > > > > >  Is
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code
in the above Java 4.3 branch not
>> > the
>> > > > > > correct
>> > > > > > > > > thing
>> > > > > > > > > > to be
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial
project?
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard
>> do
>> > not
>> > > > > mind
>> > > > > > > > moving
>> > > > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> something a little
more simpler.  If you have any
>> > > > > > > > recommendations, I
>> > > > > > > > > > would
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014
at 5:29 PM, Itamar
>> Syn-Hershko <
>> > > > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using
JIRA, as there's always some
>> form of
>> > > > > > > discussion
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> required.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please
describe what you did there?
>> The
>> > > > > spatial
>> > > > > > > > > module
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought
in line with the latest
>> spatial4j
>> > > > (see
>> > > > > > > > > > spatial4n, which
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought
up to date as well) and the
>> > Spatial
>> > > > > > module
>> > > > > > > > > > there. There
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot
of API changes there. I think you
>> > > picked
>> > > > > > quite
>> > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > tough task
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> --
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com
| @synhershko <
>> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer
& Consultant
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB
in Action <
>> > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23,
2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
>> > > > > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
>> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for
getting going on this! No we do not
>> use
>> > > pull
>> > > > > > > requests
>> > > > > > > > > on
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently.
>> something to
>> > > go
>> > > > > > > > upstream,
>> > > > > > > > > > let me
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> know and I
can pull from your fork and push it
>> up.
>> > > > > > Eventually
>> > > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > > > > can get
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit
access if you make enough progress to
>> > make
>> > > it
>> > > > > > > > > > worthwhile. We
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet
been using Jira for any of the 4.x
>> work
>> > > as I
>> > > > > > don't
>> > > > > > > > > > think it's
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that
stage of needing tickets for
>> issues.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb
22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <
>> > > > > > > judebo@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I started
by working in the Contrib.Spatial
>> project
>> > > and
>> > > > > > made
>> > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > lot
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress
to get the number of build errors
>> down.
>> > > >  From
>> > > > > > my
>> > > > > > > > > > public repo
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> where I
cloned the lucene.net repo, I committed
>> > and
>> > > > then
>> > > > > > > sent
>> > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request
through GitHub.  If it does not
>> show
>> > on
>> > > > your
>> > > > > > > end,
>> > > > > > > > or
>> > > > > > > > > > I did not
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow
the correct steps to get changes to you,
>> > > > > let
>> > > > > > me
>> > > > > > > > > know.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should
I create a ticket in Jira to complete the
>> > > > porting
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial
project, and continue to work on that
>> until
>> > > it
>> > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > complete?
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed,
Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott
>> Nasser <
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude
-
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks
for offering to help, right now we are
>> > > looking
>> > > > at
>> > > > > > > > porting
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe
the current process would be to check
>> > out
>> > > > our
>> > > > > > > JIRA (
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET -
>> > > > right
>> > > > > > now
>> > > > > > > > > it's
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty
empty, so you might create a ticket for
>> > your
>> > > > > > specific
>> > > > > > > > > > feature).
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using
the page above and possibly Paul and
>> > Itamar's
>> > > > > help,
>> > > > > > > pick
>> > > > > > > > > > out a
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature,
create your ticket for that feature,
>> and
>> > > then
>> > > > > > > create
>> > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > pull
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll
need to have you fill out a CLA for any
>> > > > > > contribuations
>> > > > > > > > you
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> make,
just some paperwork. We can do that when
>> a
>> > > pull
>> > > > > > > request
>> > > > > > > > > > comes in.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul
or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a
>> > specific
>> > > > > > feature
>> > > > > > > > > that
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude
could work on for us?
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
I would love to contribute. I am a Sr.
>> Software
>> > > > > Engineer
>> > > > > > > who
>> > > > > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked
>> on
>> > an
>> > > > open
>> > > > > > > > source
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project
but I
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
have been wanting to, so I am hoping this
>> would
>> > > be a
>> > > > > > good
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity
to do
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
>> > jude_bowman@hotmail.comifI
>> > > > > > > would
>> > > > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible
to
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
contribute.
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
Thanks!
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
Jude
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> --
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software
Engineer
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Paul Irwin
>> > > > > > > > Lead Software Engineer
>> > > > > > > > feature[23]
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>> > > > > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Paul Irwin
>> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
>> > > > > feature[23]
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >
>> > > Paul Irwin
>> > > Lead Software Engineer
>> > > feature[23]
>> > >
>> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
>> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Paul Irwin