lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From michael herndon <mhern...@michaelherndon.com>
Subject Re: Lucene.net 4?
Date Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:01:36 GMT
Personally I like using other mediums, but all technical decisions needs to
be made on the public mailing lists and be open for discussion.  So if
conversations happen outside of the list, it will need to be brought back
here at some point.

https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#mailing-list-naming-policy



On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com> wrote:

> I think now that discussion is kicking up again it'd be good to do a Google
> Hangout sometime to discuss some of this. Anyone else interested in doing
> that?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Lucene.Net has a history of working on mono, which is one of the reasons
> > NUnit is still used. Does xUnit work on Mono consistently yet?
> >
> > While the carrot test randomizer also runs the tests in random order and
> > provides random generated values, I think the real point of it being used
> > is to log stack information and seed information so that when a
> randomized
> > test fails, the failure can be reproduced and repeated.
> >
> > One of the problems of the Lucene test suite in the past is that tests
> > would randomly fail, but it was hard to figure to out the cause.
> >
> > -M
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I'd say we are at a stage where restructuring makes sense even if it
> > delays
> > > shipping the next version, if it will help us keep up with future
> > versions
> > > faster in the future.
> > >
> > > There are solutions for randomized testing in .NET which don't involve
> > > porting more stuff from Java. As far as I'm concerned we can even
> switch
> > to
> > > xUnit.NET if it makes more sense.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:30 AM, michael herndon <
> > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > The test framework needs to be completed first.  It looks likes the
> > test
> > > > framework is making using of external junit addins
> > > >
> > > > Parts of following libraries may need to be ported and nunit
> extended .
> > > > https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting  (Apache 2.0)
> > > > https://github.com/ferstl/junit-testgroups  (Mit)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, michael herndon <
> > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > These items are good ideas and should be entered into Jira as some
> > kind
> > > > of
> > > > > project meta task so that decisions can be tracked and prioritized.
> > > > >
> > > > > With a code base of this size, each project wide change like
> > switching
> > > > > asserts comes at a cost and so does getting automation right.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is the primary goal of branch_4x to ship soon as possible? or is it
> > to
> > > > > increase the sustainability of the project ?
> > > > >
> > > > > These goals are not mutually exclusive. However, it is easier to
> > > > > prioritize work items if there is some primary goal or agreed upon
> > > > > prioritization of goals.
> > > > >
> > > > > -----------
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll start with getting the core test library and test framework to
> > > > > compile and making it obvious which classes need to be converted /
> > > > updated.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I'll let someone else drive that... haha
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I am not a R# user. But I did put all the logic for doing the
> syntax
> > > > >> conversion in a separate library in that repo, so it should be
> > > > relatively
> > > > >> easy to take that and add to a plugin, I would guess.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >> >wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Cool, then I'll look into that. Any chance you can make it a R#
> > > > plugin?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > >> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Irwin <
> pirwin@feature23.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a
> > syntactic
> > > > >> > > conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It
> > does
> > > > not
> > > > >> > > resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit
> faster
> > > than
> > > > >> > doing
> > > > >> > > the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > >> itamar@code972.com
> > > > >> > > >wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a
> > > waste
> > > > >> of
> > > > >> > > time
> > > > >> > > > to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be
> doing
> > > is
> > > > >> > > > copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing
> > import
> > > > >> with
> > > > >> > > > using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could
> > automate
> > > > that
> > > > >> > > could
> > > > >> > > > be great) and the rest should just compile and work because
> > the
> > > > >> tests
> > > > >> > > > framework already supports most of what happens there.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > --
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > >> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/
> >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <
> > > pirwin@feature23.com>
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java
> to
> > > C#
> > > > >> > > converter
> > > > >> > > > > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It
> > uses
> > > > >> Roslyn
> > > > >> > > for
> > > > >> > > > > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later
> porting
> > > > work.
> > > > >> > It's
> > > > >> > > > far
> > > > >> > > > > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax
> correctly.
> > > It
> > > > >> warns
> > > > >> > > you
> > > > >> > > > > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> > > > >> > > > > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Maybe that will help?
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > > >> > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > +1
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing
> > > framework
> > > > >> for
> > > > >> > > > > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly
> > copy-pasted
> > > > and
> > > > >> > just
> > > > >> > > > > run.
> > > > >> > > > > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a
> smart
> > > base
> > > > >> > class
> > > > >> > > > that
> > > > >> > > > > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts
> into
> > > > >> their C#
> > > > >> > > > > > equivalents.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET
> > > > >> standards, I
> > > > >> > > see
> > > > >> > > > > no
> > > > >> > > > > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got
> around
> > > to
> > > > >> doing
> > > > >> > > it
> > > > >> > > > > yet.
> > > > >> > > > > > Will be happy to help tho.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > --
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > >> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > >> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> > > > >> > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards
> > > getting
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > > tests
> > > > >> > > > > > to a
> > > > >> > > > > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to
> > > > >> duplicate
> > > > >> > > work
> > > > >> > > > > > > either.
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on,
> then
> > > > I'll
> > > > >> go
> > > > >> > > > ahead
> > > > >> > > > > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > > start working on getting the the Core test library
> into
> > a
> > > > >> state
> > > > >> > > that
> > > > >> > > > it
> > > > >> > > > > > can
> > > > >> > > > > > > be compiled and run tests.
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > > > >> pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even
> > today.
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for
> > core
> > > at
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > > > moment?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar
> Syn-Hershko <
> > > > >> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list.
> > Keep
> > > > >> pushing
> > > > >> > > > > commits
> > > > >> > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > your
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be
> merged
> > > let
> > > > >> us
> > > > >> > > know.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > >> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > > >> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > > > >> > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback.  I added a Jira
> > task
> > > > for
> > > > >> > this
> > > > >> > > > > work:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that
> > they
> > > > >> can be
> > > > >> > > > > merged
> > > > >> > > > > > > into
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > branch.  Please let me know if I should change
> > the
> > > > >> way I
> > > > >> > am
> > > > >> > > > > doing
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > anything
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar
> > > Syn-Hershko <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > >> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > > >> > > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman
> <
> > > > >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to
> > halt
> > > > the
> > > > >> > > work I
> > > > >> > > > > was
> > > > >> > > > > > > > doing
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\"
> folder
> > > to
> > > > >> match
> > > > >> > > > what
> > > > >> > > > > is
> > > > >> > > > > > > in
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes
> > added
> > > > as
> > > > >> > well
> > > > >> > > > as a
> > > > >> > > > > > few
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > other
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with
> > fine
> > > > >> grain,
> > > > >> > or
> > > > >> > > > is
> > > > >> > > > > > > what I
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > did
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of
> > > changes?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude
> Bowman <
> > > > >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Sure.  I stated by looking at the Java
> > version
> > > > from
> > > > >> > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the
> > > classes
> > > > >> that
> > > > >> > > > > already
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > exist,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the
> > > > >> Spatial\BBox
> > > > >> > > > > > > > subdirectory)
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java
> > 4.3
> > > > >> > version
> > > > >> > > > that
> > > > >> > > > > > do
> > > > >> > > > > > > > not
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n
> > > component
> > > > of
> > > > >> > this
> > > > >> > > > > > > project.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >  Is
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3
> > branch
> > > > not
> > > > >> > the
> > > > >> > > > > > correct
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > thing
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > to be
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start
> > > with, I
> > > > >> do
> > > > >> > not
> > > > >> > > > > mind
> > > > >> > > > > > > > moving
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler.  If you
> have
> > > any
> > > > >> > > > > > > > recommendations, I
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar
> > > > >> Syn-Hershko <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always
> > some
> > > > >> form of
> > > > >> > > > > > > discussion
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> required.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did
> > > > there?
> > > > >> The
> > > > >> > > > > spatial
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > module
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the
> latest
> > > > >> spatial4j
> > > > >> > > > (see
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > spatial4n, which
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well)
> and
> > > the
> > > > >> > Spatial
> > > > >> > > > > > module
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > there. There
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I
> > think
> > > > you
> > > > >> > > picked
> > > > >> > > > > > quite
> > > > >> > > > > > > a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > tough task
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > >> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > > >> > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul
> > Irwin <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we
> do
> > > not
> > > > >> use
> > > > >> > > pull
> > > > >> > > > > > > requests
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > on
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for
> > > > >> something to
> > > > >> > > go
> > > > >> > > > > > > > upstream,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > let me
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and
> push
> > > it
> > > > >> up.
> > > > >> > > > > > Eventually
> > > > >> > > > > > > we
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > can get
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough
> > progress
> > > > to
> > > > >> > make
> > > > >> > > it
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > worthwhile. We
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of
> the
> > > 4.x
> > > > >> work
> > > > >> > > as I
> > > > >> > > > > > don't
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > think it's
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets
> for
> > > > >> issues.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude
> > Bowman
> > > <
> > > > >> > > > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the
> > Contrib.Spatial
> > > > >> project
> > > > >> > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > made
> > > > >> > > > > > > a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > lot
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build
> > > errors
> > > > >> down.
> > > > >> > > >  From
> > > > >> > > > > > my
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > public repo
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I
> > > > committed
> > > > >> > and
> > > > >> > > > then
> > > > >> > > > > > > sent
> > > > >> > > > > > > > a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub.  If it does
> > not
> > > > >> show
> > > > >> > on
> > > > >> > > > your
> > > > >> > > > > > > end,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > or
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I did not
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes
> to
> > > > you,
> > > > >> > > please
> > > > >> > > > > let
> > > > >> > > > > > me
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > know.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to
> > complete
> > > > the
> > > > >> > > > porting
> > > > >> > > > > of
> > > > >> > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on
> > > that
> > > > >> until
> > > > >> > > it
> > > > >> > > > is
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > complete?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM,
> Prescott
> > > > >> Nasser <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now
> we
> > > are
> > > > >> > > looking
> > > > >> > > > at
> > > > >> > > > > > > > porting
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be
> to
> > > > check
> > > > >> > out
> > > > >> > > > our
> > > > >> > > > > > > JIRA (
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET -
> > > > >> > > > right
> > > > >> > > > > > now
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > it's
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a
> > ticket
> > > > for
> > > > >> > your
> > > > >> > > > > > specific
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > feature).
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul
> > and
> > > > >> > Itamar's
> > > > >> > > > > help,
> > > > >> > > > > > > pick
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > out a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that
> > > feature,
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> > > then
> > > > >> > > > > > > create
> > > > >> > > > > > > > a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > pull
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA
> for
> > > any
> > > > >> > > > > > contribuations
> > > > >> > > > > > > > you
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do
> that
> > > > when
> > > > >> a
> > > > >> > > pull
> > > > >> > > > > > > request
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > comes in.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is
> > there a
> > > > >> > specific
> > > > >> > > > > > feature
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > that
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a
> Sr.
> > > > >> Software
> > > > >> > > > > Engineer
> > > > >> > > > > > > who
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > is
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never
> > > worked
> > > > >> on
> > > > >> > an
> > > > >> > > > open
> > > > >> > > > > > > > source
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping
> > this
> > > > >> would
> > > > >> > > be a
> > > > >> > > > > > good
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at
> > > > >> > jude_bowman@hotmail.comifI
> > > > >> > > > > > > would
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > be
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > --
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > >> > > > > > > > feature[23]
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > --
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > >> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > >> > > > > feature[23]
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > --
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Paul Irwin
> > > > >> > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > >> > > feature[23]
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Paul Irwin
> > > > >> Lead Software Engineer
> > > > >> feature[23]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > >> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Paul Irwin
> Lead Software Engineer
> feature[23]
>
> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> Cell: 863-698-9294
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message