lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: Lucene.net 4?
Date Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:17:28 GMT
I'd say we are at a stage where restructuring makes sense even if it delays
shipping the next version, if it will help us keep up with future versions
faster in the future.

There are solutions for randomized testing in .NET which don't involve
porting more stuff from Java. As far as I'm concerned we can even switch to
xUnit.NET if it makes more sense.

--

Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>


On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:30 AM, michael herndon <mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> wrote:

> The test framework needs to be completed first.  It looks likes the test
> framework is making using of external junit addins
>
> Parts of following libraries may need to be ported and nunit extended .
> https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting  (Apache 2.0)
> https://github.com/ferstl/junit-testgroups  (Mit)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, michael herndon <
> mherndon@michaelherndon.com> wrote:
>
> > These items are good ideas and should be entered into Jira as some kind
> of
> > project meta task so that decisions can be tracked and prioritized.
> >
> > With a code base of this size, each project wide change like switching
> > asserts comes at a cost and so does getting automation right.
> >
> > Is the primary goal of branch_4x to ship soon as possible? or is it to
> > increase the sustainability of the project ?
> >
> > These goals are not mutually exclusive. However, it is easier to
> > prioritize work items if there is some primary goal or agreed upon
> > prioritization of goals.
> >
> > -----------
> >
> > I'll start with getting the core test library and test framework to
> > compile and making it obvious which classes need to be converted /
> updated.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'll let someone else drive that... haha
> >>
> >> I am not a R# user. But I did put all the logic for doing the syntax
> >> conversion in a separate library in that repo, so it should be
> relatively
> >> easy to take that and add to a plugin, I would guess.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > Cool, then I'll look into that. Any chance you can make it a R#
> plugin?
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a syntactic
> >> > > conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It does
> not
> >> > > resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit faster than
> >> > doing
> >> > > the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> >> itamar@code972.com
> >> > > >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a
waste
> >> of
> >> > > time
> >> > > > to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be doing
is
> >> > > > copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing import
> >> with
> >> > > > using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could automate
> that
> >> > > could
> >> > > > be great) and the rest should just compile and work because the
> >> tests
> >> > > > framework already supports most of what happens there.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java
to C#
> >> > > converter
> >> > > > > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It
uses
> >> Roslyn
> >> > > for
> >> > > > > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting
> work.
> >> > It's
> >> > > > far
> >> > > > > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly.
It
> >> warns
> >> > > you
> >> > > > > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> >> > > > > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Maybe that will help?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> >> > > itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > > >wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > +1
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing
framework
> >> for
> >> > > > > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly copy-pasted
> and
> >> > just
> >> > > > > run.
> >> > > > > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a
smart base
> >> > class
> >> > > > that
> >> > > > > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts
into
> >> their C#
> >> > > > > > equivalents.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET
> >> standards, I
> >> > > see
> >> > > > > no
> >> > > > > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got
around to
> >> doing
> >> > > it
> >> > > > > yet.
> >> > > > > > Will be happy to help tho.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> >> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> >> > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards
getting
> >> the
> >> > > > tests
> >> > > > > > to a
> >> > > > > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't
want to
> >> duplicate
> >> > > work
> >> > > > > > > either.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked
on, then
> I'll
> >> go
> >> > > > ahead
> >> > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > start working on getting the the Core test library
into a
> >> state
> >> > > that
> >> > > > it
> >> > > > > > can
> >> > > > > > > be compiled and run tests.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <
> >> pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > >
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe
even today.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon
<
> >> > > > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x
for core at
> >> the
> >> > > > > moment?
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar
Syn-Hershko <
> >> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the
mailing list. Keep
> >> pushing
> >> > > > > commits
> >> > > > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > > > your
> >> > > > > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is
ready to be merged let
> >> us
> >> > > know.
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko
<
> >> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> >> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM,
Jude Bowman <
> >> > > judebo@gmail.com
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback.
 I added a Jira task
> for
> >> > this
> >> > > > > work:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul
my commit's so that they
> >> can be
> >> > > > > merged
> >> > > > > > > into
> >> > > > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > > branch.  Please let me know
if I should change the
> >> way I
> >> > am
> >> > > > > doing
> >> > > > > > > > > > anything
> >> > > > > > > > > > > or any other feedback that
may be helpful.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27
PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> >> > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more
often...
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an
effort on this
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> --
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko
<
> >> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer &
Consultant
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action
<
> >> > > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at
12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <
> >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving
along, I decided to halt
> the
> >> > > work I
> >> > > > > was
> >> > > > > > > > doing
> >> > > > > > > > > > in
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started
adding classes to
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\"
folder to
> >> match
> >> > > > what
> >> > > > > is
> >> > > > > > > in
> >> > > > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3"
Java branch.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with
a lot of new classes added
> as
> >> > well
> >> > > > as a
> >> > > > > > few
> >> > > > > > > > > other
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> changes needed to
work in Miscellaneous.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to
commit more often with fine
> >> grain,
> >> > or
> >> > > > is
> >> > > > > > > what I
> >> > > > > > > > > did
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> fine where I have
a commit with a lot of changes?
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014
at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <
> >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Sure.  I stated
by looking at the Java version
> from
> >> > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> branch. located
at
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I basically was
attempting to
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of
all the build errors in the classes
> >> that
> >> > > > > already
> >> > > > > > > > > exist,
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the
classes/files (such as the
> >> Spatial\BBox
> >> > > > > > > > subdirectory)
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist
in the 4.3 Java version,
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new
classes that are in the Java 4.3
> >> > version
> >> > > > that
> >> > > > > > do
> >> > > > > > > > not
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET
version yet.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware
of spatial4j/spatial4n component
> of
> >> > this
> >> > > > > > > project.
> >> > > > > > > > >  Is
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the
code in the above Java 4.3 branch
> not
> >> > the
> >> > > > > > correct
> >> > > > > > > > > thing
> >> > > > > > > > > > to be
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> doing for this
Spatial project?
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick
too hard of a task to start with, I
> >> do
> >> > not
> >> > > > > mind
> >> > > > > > > > moving
> >> > > > > > > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> something a little
more simpler.  If you have any
> >> > > > > > > > recommendations, I
> >> > > > > > > > > > would
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22,
2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar
> >> Syn-Hershko <
> >> > > > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work
using JIRA, as there's always some
> >> form of
> >> > > > > > > discussion
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> required.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can
you please describe what you did
> there?
> >> The
> >> > > > > spatial
> >> > > > > > > > > module
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be
brought in line with the latest
> >> spatial4j
> >> > > > (see
> >> > > > > > > > > > spatial4n, which
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be
brought up to date as well) and the
> >> > Spatial
> >> > > > > > module
> >> > > > > > > > > > there. There
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> have been
a lot of API changes there. I think
> you
> >> > > picked
> >> > > > > > quite
> >> > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > tough task
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> --
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com
| @synhershko <
> >> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance
Developer & Consultant
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Author of
RavenDB in Action <
> >> > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb
23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul Irwin <
> >> > > > > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks
for getting going on this! No we do not
> >> use
> >> > > pull
> >> > > > > > > requests
> >> > > > > > > > > on
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub
currently. Once you're ready for
> >> something to
> >> > > go
> >> > > > > > > > upstream,
> >> > > > > > > > > > let me
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> know and
I can pull from your fork and push it
> >> up.
> >> > > > > > Eventually
> >> > > > > > > we
> >> > > > > > > > > > can get
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit
access if you make enough progress
> to
> >> > make
> >> > > it
> >> > > > > > > > > > worthwhile. We
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't
yet been using Jira for any of the 4.x
> >> work
> >> > > as I
> >> > > > > > don't
> >> > > > > > > > > > think it's
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite
to that stage of needing tickets for
> >> issues.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat,
Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude Bowman <
> >> > > > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I
started by working in the Contrib.Spatial
> >> project
> >> > > and
> >> > > > > > made
> >> > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > lot
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of
progress to get the number of build errors
> >> down.
> >> > > >  From
> >> > > > > > my
> >> > > > > > > > > > public repo
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> where
I cloned the lucene.net repo, I
> committed
> >> > and
> >> > > > then
> >> > > > > > > sent
> >> > > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull
request through GitHub.  If it does not
> >> show
> >> > on
> >> > > > your
> >> > > > > > > end,
> >> > > > > > > > or
> >> > > > > > > > > > I did not
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow
the correct steps to get changes to
> you,
> >> > > please
> >> > > > > let
> >> > > > > > me
> >> > > > > > > > > know.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should
I create a ticket in Jira to complete
> the
> >> > > > porting
> >> > > > > of
> >> > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial
project, and continue to work on that
> >> until
> >> > > it
> >> > > > is
> >> > > > > > > > > complete?
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On
Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott
> >> Nasser <
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
Jude -
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
Thanks for offering to help, right now we are
> >> > > looking
> >> > > > at
> >> > > > > > > > porting
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
I believe the current process would be to
> check
> >> > out
> >> > > > our
> >> > > > > > > JIRA (
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET -
> >> > > > right
> >> > > > > > now
> >> > > > > > > > > it's
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
pretty empty, so you might create a ticket
> for
> >> > your
> >> > > > > > specific
> >> > > > > > > > > > feature).
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
Using the page above and possibly Paul and
> >> > Itamar's
> >> > > > > help,
> >> > > > > > > pick
> >> > > > > > > > > > out a
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
feature, create your ticket for that feature,
> >> and
> >> > > then
> >> > > > > > > create
> >> > > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > pull
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
request.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for any
> >> > > > > > contribuations
> >> > > > > > > > you
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
make, just some paperwork. We can do that
> when
> >> a
> >> > > pull
> >> > > > > > > request
> >> > > > > > > > > > comes in.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is there a
> >> > specific
> >> > > > > > feature
> >> > > > > > > > > that
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
Jude could work on for us?
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
~P
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> I would love to contribute. I am a Sr.
> >> Software
> >> > > > > Engineer
> >> > > > > > > who
> >> > > > > > > > > is
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
currently
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never worked
> >> on
> >> > an
> >> > > > open
> >> > > > > > > > source
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
project but I
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> have been wanting to, so I am hoping this
> >> would
> >> > > be a
> >> > > > > > good
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
oppertunity to do
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> so. Please contact me at
> >> > jude_bowman@hotmail.comifI
> >> > > > > > > would
> >> > > > > > > > > be
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
eligible to
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> contribute.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> Thanks!
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> Jude
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software
Engineer
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Email:
pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell:
863-698-9294
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Paul Irwin
> >> > > > > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> >> > > > > > > > feature[23]
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > > > > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Paul Irwin
> >> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> >> > > > > feature[23]
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > >
> >> > > Paul Irwin
> >> > > Lead Software Engineer
> >> > > feature[23]
> >> > >
> >> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> >> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Paul Irwin
> >> Lead Software Engineer
> >> feature[23]
> >>
> >> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> >> Cell: 863-698-9294
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message