lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Irwin <pir...@feature23.com>
Subject Re: Lucene.net 4?
Date Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:35:17 GMT
I think now that discussion is kicking up again it'd be good to do a Google
Hangout sometime to discuss some of this. Anyone else interested in doing
that?


On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> wrote:

> Lucene.Net has a history of working on mono, which is one of the reasons
> NUnit is still used. Does xUnit work on Mono consistently yet?
>
> While the carrot test randomizer also runs the tests in random order and
> provides random generated values, I think the real point of it being used
> is to log stack information and seed information so that when a randomized
> test fails, the failure can be reproduced and repeated.
>
> One of the problems of the Lucene test suite in the past is that tests
> would randomly fail, but it was hard to figure to out the cause.
>
> -M
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I'd say we are at a stage where restructuring makes sense even if it
> delays
> > shipping the next version, if it will help us keep up with future
> versions
> > faster in the future.
> >
> > There are solutions for randomized testing in .NET which don't involve
> > porting more stuff from Java. As far as I'm concerned we can even switch
> to
> > xUnit.NET if it makes more sense.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:30 AM, michael herndon <
> > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > The test framework needs to be completed first.  It looks likes the
> test
> > > framework is making using of external junit addins
> > >
> > > Parts of following libraries may need to be ported and nunit extended .
> > > https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting  (Apache 2.0)
> > > https://github.com/ferstl/junit-testgroups  (Mit)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, michael herndon <
> > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > These items are good ideas and should be entered into Jira as some
> kind
> > > of
> > > > project meta task so that decisions can be tracked and prioritized.
> > > >
> > > > With a code base of this size, each project wide change like
> switching
> > > > asserts comes at a cost and so does getting automation right.
> > > >
> > > > Is the primary goal of branch_4x to ship soon as possible? or is it
> to
> > > > increase the sustainability of the project ?
> > > >
> > > > These goals are not mutually exclusive. However, it is easier to
> > > > prioritize work items if there is some primary goal or agreed upon
> > > > prioritization of goals.
> > > >
> > > > -----------
> > > >
> > > > I'll start with getting the core test library and test framework to
> > > > compile and making it obvious which classes need to be converted /
> > > updated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I'll let someone else drive that... haha
> > > >>
> > > >> I am not a R# user. But I did put all the logic for doing the syntax
> > > >> conversion in a separate library in that repo, so it should be
> > > relatively
> > > >> easy to take that and add to a plugin, I would guess.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > itamar@code972.com
> > > >> >wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Cool, then I'll look into that. Any chance you can make it a R#
> > > plugin?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > >> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a
> syntactic
> > > >> > > conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It
> does
> > > not
> > > >> > > resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit faster
> > than
> > > >> > doing
> > > >> > > the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > >> itamar@code972.com
> > > >> > > >wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a
> > waste
> > > >> of
> > > >> > > time
> > > >> > > > to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be doing
> > is
> > > >> > > > copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing
> import
> > > >> with
> > > >> > > > using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could
> automate
> > > that
> > > >> > > could
> > > >> > > > be great) and the rest should just compile and work because
> the
> > > >> tests
> > > >> > > > framework already supports most of what happens there.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > --
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > >> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <
> > pirwin@feature23.com>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java to
> > C#
> > > >> > > converter
> > > >> > > > > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It
> uses
> > > >> Roslyn
> > > >> > > for
> > > >> > > > > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting
> > > work.
> > > >> > It's
> > > >> > > > far
> > > >> > > > > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly.
> > It
> > > >> warns
> > > >> > > you
> > > >> > > > > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> > > >> > > > > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Maybe that will help?
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > >> > > itamar@code972.com
> > > >> > > > > >wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > +1
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing
> > framework
> > > >> for
> > > >> > > > > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly
> copy-pasted
> > > and
> > > >> > just
> > > >> > > > > run.
> > > >> > > > > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart
> > base
> > > >> > class
> > > >> > > > that
> > > >> > > > > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into
> > > >> their C#
> > > >> > > > > > equivalents.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET
> > > >> standards, I
> > > >> > > see
> > > >> > > > > no
> > > >> > > > > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around
> > to
> > > >> doing
> > > >> > > it
> > > >> > > > > yet.
> > > >> > > > > > Will be happy to help tho.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > >> https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > >> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> http://manning.com/synhershko/
> > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> > > >> > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards
> > getting
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > tests
> > > >> > > > > > to a
> > > >> > > > > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to
> > > >> duplicate
> > > >> > > work
> > > >> > > > > > > either.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then
> > > I'll
> > > >> go
> > > >> > > > ahead
> > > >> > > > > > and
> > > >> > > > > > > start working on getting the the Core test library into
> a
> > > >> state
> > > >> > > that
> > > >> > > > it
> > > >> > > > > > can
> > > >> > > > > > > be compiled and run tests.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <
> > > >> pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even
> today.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > > >> > > > > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for
> core
> > at
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > > moment?
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > >> > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list.
> Keep
> > > >> pushing
> > > >> > > > > commits
> > > >> > > > > > > to
> > > >> > > > > > > > > your
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged
> > let
> > > >> us
> > > >> > > know.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > >> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > >> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > > >> > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback.  I added a Jira
> task
> > > for
> > > >> > this
> > > >> > > > > work:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that
> they
> > > >> can be
> > > >> > > > > merged
> > > >> > > > > > > into
> > > >> > > > > > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > branch.  Please let me know if I should change
> the
> > > >> way I
> > > >> > am
> > > >> > > > > doing
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > anything
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar
> > Syn-Hershko <
> > > >> > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > >> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > >> > > http://manning.com/synhershko/
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > > >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to
> halt
> > > the
> > > >> > > work I
> > > >> > > > > was
> > > >> > > > > > > > doing
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder
> > to
> > > >> match
> > > >> > > > what
> > > >> > > > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > in
> > > >> > > > > > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes
> added
> > > as
> > > >> > well
> > > >> > > > as a
> > > >> > > > > > few
> > > >> > > > > > > > > other
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/judebowman/lucene.net/commit/ad93e0ffc37e9338d31335ff7bd1429e1a89b09c
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with
> fine
> > > >> grain,
> > > >> > or
> > > >> > > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > what I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > did
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of
> > changes?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman <
> > > >> > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Sure.  I stated by looking at the Java
> version
> > > from
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in the
> > classes
> > > >> that
> > > >> > > > > already
> > > >> > > > > > > > > exist,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the
> > > >> Spatial\BBox
> > > >> > > > > > > > subdirectory)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the Java
> 4.3
> > > >> > version
> > > >> > > > that
> > > >> > > > > > do
> > > >> > > > > > > > not
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n
> > component
> > > of
> > > >> > this
> > > >> > > > > > > project.
> > > >> > > > > > > > >  Is
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3
> branch
> > > not
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > > > > correct
> > > >> > > > > > > > > thing
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > to be
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start
> > with, I
> > > >> do
> > > >> > not
> > > >> > > > > mind
> > > >> > > > > > > > moving
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler.  If you have
> > any
> > > >> > > > > > > > recommendations, I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > would
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar
> > > >> Syn-Hershko <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's always
> some
> > > >> form of
> > > >> > > > > > > discussion
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> required.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what you did
> > > there?
> > > >> The
> > > >> > > > > spatial
> > > >> > > > > > > > > module
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the latest
> > > >> spatial4j
> > > >> > > > (see
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > spatial4n, which
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as well) and
> > the
> > > >> > Spatial
> > > >> > > > > > module
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > there. There
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there. I
> think
> > > you
> > > >> > > picked
> > > >> > > > > > quite
> > > >> > > > > > > a
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > tough task
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> --
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > >> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > > >> > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Paul
> Irwin <
> > > >> > > > > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this! No we do
> > not
> > > >> use
> > > >> > > pull
> > > >> > > > > > > requests
> > > >> > > > > > > > > on
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're ready for
> > > >> something to
> > > >> > > go
> > > >> > > > > > > > upstream,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > let me
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your fork and push
> > it
> > > >> up.
> > > >> > > > > > Eventually
> > > >> > > > > > > we
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > can get
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make enough
> progress
> > > to
> > > >> > make
> > > >> > > it
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > worthwhile. We
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for any of the
> > 4.x
> > > >> work
> > > >> > > as I
> > > >> > > > > > don't
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > think it's
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing tickets for
> > > >> issues.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jude
> Bowman
> > <
> > > >> > > > > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the
> Contrib.Spatial
> > > >> project
> > > >> > > and
> > > >> > > > > > made
> > > >> > > > > > > a
> > > >> > > > > > > > > lot
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number of build
> > errors
> > > >> down.
> > > >> > > >  From
> > > >> > > > > > my
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > public repo
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net repo, I
> > > committed
> > > >> > and
> > > >> > > > then
> > > >> > > > > > > sent
> > > >> > > > > > > > a
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub.  If it does
> not
> > > >> show
> > > >> > on
> > > >> > > > your
> > > >> > > > > > > end,
> > > >> > > > > > > > or
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > I did not
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to get changes to
> > > you,
> > > >> > > please
> > > >> > > > > let
> > > >> > > > > > me
> > > >> > > > > > > > > know.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in Jira to
> complete
> > > the
> > > >> > > > porting
> > > >> > > > > of
> > > >> > > > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue to work on
> > that
> > > >> until
> > > >> > > it
> > > >> > > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > > > complete?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Prescott
> > > >> Nasser <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to help, right now we
> > are
> > > >> > > looking
> > > >> > > > at
> > > >> > > > > > > > porting
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look at this page)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current process would be to
> > > check
> > > >> > out
> > > >> > > > our
> > > >> > > > > > > JIRA (
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET -
> > > >> > > > right
> > > >> > > > > > now
> > > >> > > > > > > > > it's
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might create a
> ticket
> > > for
> > > >> > your
> > > >> > > > > > specific
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > feature).
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and possibly Paul
> and
> > > >> > Itamar's
> > > >> > > > > help,
> > > >> > > > > > > pick
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > out a
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket for that
> > feature,
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > then
> > > >> > > > > > > create
> > > >> > > > > > > > a
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > pull
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you fill out a CLA for
> > any
> > > >> > > > > > contribuations
> > > >> > > > > > > > you
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork. We can do that
> > > when
> > > >> a
> > > >> > > pull
> > > >> > > > > > > request
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > comes in.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone else), is
> there a
> > > >> > specific
> > > >> > > > > > feature
> > > >> > > > > > > > > that
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for us?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net 4?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute. I am a Sr.
> > > >> Software
> > > >> > > > > Engineer
> > > >> > > > > > > who
> > > >> > > > > > > > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net 3.0.3. I have never
> > worked
> > > >> on
> > > >> > an
> > > >> > > > open
> > > >> > > > > > > > source
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting to, so I am hoping
> this
> > > >> would
> > > >> > > be a
> > > >> > > > > > good
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > so. Please contact me at
> > > >> > jude_bowman@hotmail.comifI
> > > >> > > > > > > would
> > > >> > > > > > > > > be
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > >> > > > > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > >> > > > > > > > feature[23]
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> > > > > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > --
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > >> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > >> > > > > feature[23]
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > --
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Paul Irwin
> > > >> > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > >> > > feature[23]
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> Paul Irwin
> > > >> Lead Software Engineer
> > > >> feature[23]
> > > >>
> > > >> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > >> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 

Paul Irwin
Lead Software Engineer
feature[23]

Email: pirwin@feature23.com
Cell: 863-698-9294

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message