# lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

##### Site index · List index
Message view
Top
From Paul Irwin <pir...@feature23.com>
Subject Re: Lucene.net 4?
Date Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:11:01 GMT
```That is exactly what the tool I created does, it does a syntactic
conversion only of Java to C# and does that work for you. It does not
resolve symbols or anything. It should help you go a bit faster than doing
the syntactic conversion manually by copy-paste.

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>wrote:

> For porting core parts of the code? sure. I just think its a waste of time
> to work on porting tests, so the only thing I want to be doing is
> copy-paste and then as few changes as possible (replacing import with
> using, package with namespace, etc - which if we could automate that could
> be great) and the rest should just compile and work because the tests
> framework already supports most of what happens there.
>
> --
>
> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com> wrote:
>
> > I like that thinking for unit tests. I wrote a quick Java to C# converter
> > since Sharpen wasn't maintained that adds 1.7 support. It uses Roslyn for
> > the C# generation. I used this for some of my later porting work. It's
> far
> > from perfect, but handles most of the Java syntax correctly. It warns you
> > if it encounters an unsigned right-shift or
> > break-to-label/continue-to-label.
> >
> > Repo: https://github.com/paulirwin/JavaToCSharp
> >
> > Maybe that will help?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > What I'll be interested in having is a unit-testing framework for
> > > Lucene.NET where Java test classes can be mostly copy-pasted and just
> > run.
> > > That'd probably involve many extension method and a smart base class
> that
> > > will map Java syntax stuff like Array.copy or asserts into their C#
> > > equivalents.
> > >
> > > While it makes sense to have the core comply with .NET standards, I see
> > no
> > > point in duplicating the effort for testing.
> > >
> > > I was thinking of doing that myself but haven't got around to doing it
> > yet.
> > > Will be happy to help tho.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, michael herndon <
> > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't mind working on the tests or working towards getting the
> tests
> > > to a
> > > > state where they compile and pass, but I don't want to duplicate work
> > > > either.
> > > >
> > > > If the the tests are not currently being worked on, then I'll go
> > > and
> > > > start working on getting the the Core test library into a state that
> it
> > > can
> > > > be compiled and run tests.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Paul Irwin <pirwin@feature23.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I am not, I hope to jump back in soon, maybe even today.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, michael herndon <
> > > > > mherndon@michaelherndon.com
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is any one working on the tests in branch_4x for core at the
> > moment?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion in the mailing list. Keep pushing
> > commits
> > > > to
> > > > > > your
> > > > > > > branch, and when you fill it is ready to be merged let
us know.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > >
> > > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jude Bowman <judebo@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the feedback.  I added a Jira task
for this
> > work:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-540
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I will keep emailing Paul my commit's so that they
can be
> > merged
> > > > into
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > branch.  Please let me know if I should change the
way I am
> > doing
> > > > > > > anything
> > > > > > > > or any other feedback that may be helpful.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko
<
> > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Please try to commit more often...
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks for putting an effort on this
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/
> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Jude Bowman <
> > judebo@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> In order to keep moving along, I decided to
halt the work I
> > was
> > > > > doing
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > >>> Spatial and started adding classes to
> > > > > > > >>> "\src\contrib\Analyzers\Miscellaneous\" folder
to match
> what
> > is
> > > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >>> "lucene_solr_4_3" Java branch.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Here is a commit with a lot of new classes
> as a
> > > few
> > > > > > other
> > > > > > > >>> changes needed to work in Miscellaneous.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Is it preferable to commit more often with
fine grain, or
> is
> > > > what I
> > > > > > did
> > > > > > > >>> fine where I have a commit with a lot of changes?
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Thanks
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jude Bowman
<
> > judebo@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Sure.  I stated by looking at the Java
version from the
> > > > > > > lucene_solr_4_3
> > > > > > > >>>> branch. located at
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/spatial/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I basically was attempting to
> > > > > > > >>>> 1) get rid of all the build errors in
the classes that
> > > > > > exist,
> > > > > > > >>>> 2) remove the classes/files (such as the
Spatial\BBox
> > > > > subdirectory)
> > > > > > > >>>> that do not exist in the 4.3 Java version,
> > > > > > > >>>> 3) Add the new classes that are in the
Java 4.3 version
> that
> > > do
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > >>>> exist in the .NET version yet.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I was not aware of spatial4j/spatial4n
component of this
> > > > project.
> > > > > >  Is
> > > > > > > >>>> mirroring the code in the above Java 4.3
branch not the
> > > correct
> > > > > > thing
> > > > > > > to be
> > > > > > > >>>> doing for this Spatial project?
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> If I did pick too hard of a task to start
with, I do not
> > mind
> > > > > moving
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >>>> something a little more simpler.  If you
have any
> > > > > recommendations, I
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > >>>> appreciate it.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Itamar
Syn-Hershko <
> > > > > > > itamar@code972.com
> > > > > > > >>>> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Let's work using JIRA, as there's
always some form of
> > > > discussion
> > > > > > > >>>>> required.
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Jude, can you please describe what
you did there? The
> > spatial
> > > > > > module
> > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought in line with the
latest spatial4j
> (see
> > > > > > > spatial4n, which
> > > > > > > >>>>> needs to be brought up to date as
well) and the Spatial
> > > module
> > > > > > > there. There
> > > > > > > >>>>> have been a lot of API changes there.
I think you picked
> > > quite
> > > > a
> > > > > > > tough task
> > > > > > > >>>>> as your first...
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> --
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > > > > >>>>> http://code972.com | @synhershko <
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > > > > >>>>> Author of RavenDB in Action <
> > http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:22 AM,
Paul Irwin <
> > > > > pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Jude,
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for getting going on this!
No we do not use pull
> > > > requests
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > >>>>>> GitHub currently. Once you're
> > > > > upstream,
> > > > > > > let me
> > > > > > > >>>>>> know and I can pull from your
fork and push it up.
> > > Eventually
> > > > we
> > > > > > > can get
> > > > > > > >>>>>> you commit access if you make
enough progress to make it
> > > > > > > worthwhile. We
> > > > > > > >>>>>> haven't yet been using Jira for
any of the 4.x work as I
> > > don't
> > > > > > > think it's
> > > > > > > >>>>>> quite to that stage of needing
tickets for issues.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM,
Jude Bowman <
> > > > judebo@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> I started by working in the
Contrib.Spatial project and
> > > > a
> > > > > > lot
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> of progress to get the number
of build errors down.
>  From
> > > my
> > > > > > > public repo
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> where I cloned the lucene.net
repo, I committed and
> then
> > > > sent
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Pull request through GitHub.
If it does not show on
> your
> > > > end,
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > I did not
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> follow the correct steps to
> > let
> > > me
> > > > > > know.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Should I create a ticket in
Jira to complete the
> porting
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Spatial project, and continue
to work on that until it
> is
> > > > > > complete?
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jude
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:04
PM, Prescott Nasser <
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> geobmx540@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude -
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for offering to
help, right now we are looking
> at
> > > > > porting
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 4.0 over (take a look
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Lucene+4x+Port+Progress
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the current
process would be to check out
> our
> > > > JIRA (
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET
-
> right
> > > now
> > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pretty empty, so you might
create a ticket for your
> > > specific
> > > > > > > feature).
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Using the page above and
possibly Paul and Itamar's
> > help,
> > > > pick
> > > > > > > out a
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feature, create your ticket
for that feature, and then
> > > > create
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > pull
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> request.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> We'll need to have you
fill out a CLA for any
> > > contribuations
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> make, just some paperwork.
We can do that when a pull
> > > > request
> > > > > > > comes in.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Paul or Itamar (or anyone
else), is there a specific
> > > feature
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Jude could work on for
us?
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ~P
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > From: jude_bowman@hotmail.com
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene.net
4?
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb
2014 22:58:06 +0000
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > I would love to contribute.
I am a Sr. Software
> > Engineer
> > > > who
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> currently
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > using Lucene.net
3.0.3. I have never worked on an
> open
> > > > > source
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project but I
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > have been wanting
to, so I am hoping this would be a
> > > good
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> oppertunity to do
me at jude_bowman@hotmail.comif I
> > > > would
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> eligible to
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > contribute.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Thanks!
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > Jude
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Paul Irwin
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > > > >>>>>> feature[23]
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul Irwin
> > > > > Lead Software Engineer
> > > > > feature[23]
> > > > >
> > > > > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Paul Irwin
> > feature[23]
> >
> > Email: pirwin@feature23.com
> > Cell: 863-698-9294
> >
>

--

Paul Irwin