lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: Lucene 4.0
Date Fri, 09 Aug 2013 07:16:25 GMT
Hey Paul - 

If you can help us out by filling out the ICLA (http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt).
This will allow us to pull this into the official repo.
I also can't thank you enough for taking the initiative to being the port - hopefully we can
all pitch in and finish it.
~Prescott
> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 21:02:00 -0400
> Subject: Re: Lucene 4.0
> From: pirwin@feature23.com
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> 
> This has been ported in my fork/branch, but has not been tested. Please
> test away!
> 
> Also, I got the classic QueryParser from 4.3 to compile in the new
> Contrib.QueryParsers DLL, but it gets stuck in an infinite loop when using
> the default field and exceptions when specifying a field in the query.
> Anyone with experience with scanners/lexers should debug into this and take
> a look. I have a feeling the bug is in the complex scanner code of
> QueryParser or QueryParserTokenManager.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Michael Mitiaguin <
> mitiaguinm@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> 
> > Paul,
> >
> > I am greatly interested in trying Lucene 4.0  FuzzyQuery
> >
> > http://blog.mikemccandless.**com/2011/03/lucenes-**
> > fuzzyquery-is-100-times-**faster.html<http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/03/lucenes-fuzzyquery-is-100-times-faster.html>
> > Any plans to port this part  ?
> >
> >
> > On 8/9/2013 5:31 AM, Paul Irwin wrote:
> >
> >> Is this mailing list dead?! If anyone is interested in releasing an
> >> up-to-date build of Lucene.net, please write back! If you didn't read my
> >> other messages, I have Lucene.net Core working with Lucene java 4.3.1
> >> compatibility thanks to the help of my colleagues. We just need to round
> >> out the contrib modules, unit tests, and documentation as a community and
> >> we can push Lucene.net forward almost 3 years in time -- Lucene java 3.0.3
> >> was packaged in December 2010!
> >>
> >> I have checked in the KeywordAnalyzer, WhitespaceAnalyzer, SimpleAnalyzer,
> >> ClassicAnalyzer, and StandardAnalyzer to the Contrib.Analyzers assembly
> >> (where they now live in Lucene java, they were moved from core) and their
> >> associated filters and tokenizers. I've briefly tested each and they seem
> >> to work correctly. I've purposefully "Exclude[d] from Project" the other
> >> language analyzers until we can forward-port them. So now the Analyzers
> >> DLL
> >> compiles with those analyzers only. Also, I fixed the bug that was causing
> >> NumericRangeQuery to not work.
> >>
> >> Next on my list is the QueryParsers contrib library (QueryParser was moved
> >> out of Lucene java core) so that, combined with StandardAnalyzer, we can
> >> test a pretty common real-world use case (the prototypical "hello lucene"
> >> tutorial). After that, it might be worth forward-porting what we have so
> >> far to 4.4 and use that as the latest point to finish out the port. The
> >> changes shouldn't be too dramatic to core from what I can tell.
> >>
> >> My fork/branch: https://github.com/paulirwin/**
> >> lucene.net/tree/lucene_4_3_0<https://github.com/paulirwin/lucene.net/tree/lucene_4_3_0>
> >>
> >> I'll keep updating as I go, but if anyone wants to jump in, there's not a
> >> better time than now...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
 		 	   		  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message