lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Mitiaguin <mitiagu...@optusnet.com.au>
Subject Re: Lucene 4.0
Date Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:53:53 GMT
Paul,

I am greatly interested in trying Lucene 4.0  FuzzyQuery

http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/03/lucenes-fuzzyquery-is-100-times-faster.html
Any plans to port this part  ?

On 8/9/2013 5:31 AM, Paul Irwin wrote:
> Is this mailing list dead?! If anyone is interested in releasing an
> up-to-date build of Lucene.net, please write back! If you didn't read my
> other messages, I have Lucene.net Core working with Lucene java 4.3.1
> compatibility thanks to the help of my colleagues. We just need to round
> out the contrib modules, unit tests, and documentation as a community and
> we can push Lucene.net forward almost 3 years in time -- Lucene java 3.0.3
> was packaged in December 2010!
>
> I have checked in the KeywordAnalyzer, WhitespaceAnalyzer, SimpleAnalyzer,
> ClassicAnalyzer, and StandardAnalyzer to the Contrib.Analyzers assembly
> (where they now live in Lucene java, they were moved from core) and their
> associated filters and tokenizers. I've briefly tested each and they seem
> to work correctly. I've purposefully "Exclude[d] from Project" the other
> language analyzers until we can forward-port them. So now the Analyzers DLL
> compiles with those analyzers only. Also, I fixed the bug that was causing
> NumericRangeQuery to not work.
>
> Next on my list is the QueryParsers contrib library (QueryParser was moved
> out of Lucene java core) so that, combined with StandardAnalyzer, we can
> test a pretty common real-world use case (the prototypical "hello lucene"
> tutorial). After that, it might be worth forward-porting what we have so
> far to 4.4 and use that as the latest point to finish out the port. The
> changes shouldn't be too dramatic to core from what I can tell.
>
> My fork/branch: https://github.com/paulirwin/lucene.net/tree/lucene_4_3_0
>
> I'll keep updating as I go, but if anyone wants to jump in, there's not a
> better time than now...
>
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message