lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Irwin <pir...@feature23.com>
Subject RE: Lucene 4.0
Date Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:26:10 GMT
  Will do. Do all of my colleagues that have commits in my fork need to
sign one as well?

Thanks,
Paul

Sent from my Windows Phone, so please forgive my brevity!
 ------------------------------
From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>
Sent: 8/9/2013 3:16 AM
To: pirwin@feature23.com
Cc: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene 4.0

 Hey Paul -

If you can help us out by filling out the ICLA (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt). This will allow us to pull this
into the official repo.

I also can't thank you enough for taking the initiative to being the port -
hopefully we can all pitch in and finish it.

~Prescott

> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 21:02:00 -0400
> Subject: Re: Lucene 4.0
> From: pirwin@feature23.com
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>
> This has been ported in my fork/branch, but has not been tested. Please
> test away!
>
> Also, I got the classic QueryParser from 4.3 to compile in the new
> Contrib.QueryParsers DLL, but it gets stuck in an infinite loop when using
> the default field and exceptions when specifying a field in the query.
> Anyone with experience with scanners/lexers should debug into this and
take
> a look. I have a feeling the bug is in the complex scanner code of
> QueryParser or QueryParserTokenManager.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Michael Mitiaguin <
> mitiaguinm@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> > Paul,
> >
> > I am greatly interested in trying Lucene 4.0 FuzzyQuery
> >
> > http://blog.mikemccandless.**com/2011/03/lucenes-**
> > fuzzyquery-is-100-times-**faster.html<
http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/03/lucenes-fuzzyquery-is-100-times-faster.html
>
> > Any plans to port this part ?
> >
> >
> > On 8/9/2013 5:31 AM, Paul Irwin wrote:
> >
> >> Is this mailing list dead?! If anyone is interested in releasing an
> >> up-to-date build of Lucene.net, please write back! If you didn't read
my
> >> other messages, I have Lucene.net Core working with Lucene java 4.3.1
> >> compatibility thanks to the help of my colleagues. We just need to
round
> >> out the contrib modules, unit tests, and documentation as a community
and
> >> we can push Lucene.net forward almost 3 years in time -- Lucene java
3.0.3
> >> was packaged in December 2010!
> >>
> >> I have checked in the KeywordAnalyzer, WhitespaceAnalyzer,
SimpleAnalyzer,
> >> ClassicAnalyzer, and StandardAnalyzer to the Contrib.Analyzers assembly
> >> (where they now live in Lucene java, they were moved from core) and
their
> >> associated filters and tokenizers. I've briefly tested each and they
seem
> >> to work correctly. I've purposefully "Exclude[d] from Project" the
other
> >> language analyzers until we can forward-port them. So now the Analyzers
> >> DLL
> >> compiles with those analyzers only. Also, I fixed the bug that was
causing
> >> NumericRangeQuery to not work.
> >>
> >> Next on my list is the QueryParsers contrib library (QueryParser was
moved
> >> out of Lucene java core) so that, combined with StandardAnalyzer, we
can
> >> test a pretty common real-world use case (the prototypical "hello
lucene"
> >> tutorial). After that, it might be worth forward-porting what we have
so
> >> far to 4.4 and use that as the latest point to finish out the port. The
> >> changes shouldn't be too dramatic to core from what I can tell.
> >>
> >> My fork/branch: https://github.com/paulirwin/**
> >> lucene.net/tree/lucene_4_3_0<
https://github.com/paulirwin/lucene.net/tree/lucene_4_3_0>
> >>
> >> I'll keep updating as I go, but if anyone wants to jump in, there's
not a
> >> better time than now...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message