lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: Lucene v3.6
Date Tue, 01 Jan 2013 08:50:07 GMT
The general direction should be to put most of the efforts on a v4 port
(4.1 probably...) and to start finding pieces in the codebase we can easily
isolate and .NET-ify. Mostly readers, writers, structures and conversions.

Re git on apache - I believe you should ask infra.


On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Christopher Currens <
currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:

> Don't think I've forgotten about this.  While I have no idea how git under
> Apache looks like, I have a lot of comments on Lucene 3.6 (and 4.0) that I
> need to discuss on this mailing list directly relating to the porting work
> and the future direction of lucene.net.  I've had an email in my drafts
> folder for about 3 weeks now but this time of year has been so busy I
> haven't had a chance to finish it.  Soon, though, I hope.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Christopher
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hey Guys -  I've been quietly working in the background on administrative
> > stuff for a while. I really only have two things on my to-do list -  -
> What
> > does git under apache look like? I can't remember who asked this, but I
> > know I owe digging up the answer- Lucene 3.6 - planning, moving forward (
> > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/compare/5261b571...e4402c22c). Do
> > we just want to start picking things off and committing them? Are there
> > other refactoring issues we want to tackle with 3.6? We should make jira
> > tickets and start tracking. Happy holidays everyone! ~Prescott
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message