lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Currens <currens.ch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2
Date Sun, 07 Oct 2012 06:14:12 GMT
+1 The package looks good to me!  Thanks Prescott.


-Christopher

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> bleh - I'll make sure we get that fixed before I upload to nuget - I'll make two separate
packages.
>
> ----------------------------------------
>> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 02:48:27 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2
>> From: itamar@code972.com
>> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>>
>> There is one problem with the spatial nuget package. The following (taken
>> from it's nuspec) doesn't make sense:
>>
>> <dependencies>
>> <dependency id="Lucene.Net" version="3.0.3" />
>> <dependency id="Spatial4n.Core" version="0.3" />
>> <dependency id="Spatial4n.Core.NTS" version="0.3" />
>> </dependencies>
>>
>> It's either it depends on S4n.Core _or_ S4n.Core.NTS. Since Contrib.Spatial
>> and Contrib.Spatial.NTS are two different things, there should probably be
>> 2 different nuspecs and 2 different nuget packages, namely Contrib.Spatial
>> and Contrib.Spatial.NTS. Unless the community is against, in that case I'd
>> recommend having just the Contrib.Spatial.NTS package.
>>
>> +1 from me, since nupackaging doesn't require cutting a new release, just
>> changing the nuspec and generating executing nuget on them again.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
>>
>> > Alright, updated the source files, recompiled the binaries, and included
>> > the nuget packages I'll be using to upload for inspection:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/3.0.3-RC2/
>> >
>> > Please vote:
>> >
>> > +1 lets rock
>> > 0 indifferent
>> > -1 Not ready, because...
>> >
>> > Best of luck to us ;)
>> >
>> > ~Prescott
>> >

Mime
View raw message