lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2
Date Wed, 10 Oct 2012 03:34:08 GMT
Please submit bugs to jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET

~Prescott

----------------------------------------
> From: eli@directr.co
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2
> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:50:46 -0400
>
> Where do we file outstanding issues
>
> Sorry for the newbie question
>
> IndexInput has abstract method Length()
> IndexOutput has abstract property Length
>
> Seems like the same convention should be used for both.
>
> Eli
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.chris@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 2:14 AM
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2
>
> +1 The package looks good to me! Thanks Prescott.
>
>
> -Christopher
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> > bleh - I'll make sure we get that fixed before I upload to nuget - I'll
> make two separate packages.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> >> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 02:48:27 +0200
> >> Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2
> >> From: itamar@code972.com
> >> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> >>
> >> There is one problem with the spatial nuget package. The following
> >> (taken from it's nuspec) doesn't make sense:
> >>
> >> <dependencies>
> >> <dependency id="Lucene.Net" version="3.0.3" /> <dependency
> >> id="Spatial4n.Core" version="0.3" /> <dependency
> >> id="Spatial4n.Core.NTS" version="0.3" /> </dependencies>
> >>
> >> It's either it depends on S4n.Core _or_ S4n.Core.NTS. Since
> >> Contrib.Spatial and Contrib.Spatial.NTS are two different things,
> >> there should probably be
> >> 2 different nuspecs and 2 different nuget packages, namely
> >> Contrib.Spatial and Contrib.Spatial.NTS. Unless the community is
> >> against, in that case I'd recommend having just the Contrib.Spatial.NTS
> package.
> >>
> >> +1 from me, since nupackaging doesn't require cutting a new release,
> >> +just
> >> changing the nuspec and generating executing nuget on them again.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Prescott Nasser
> <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >> > Alright, updated the source files, recompiled the binaries, and
> >> > included the nuget packages I'll be using to upload for inspection:
> >> >
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/3.0.3-RC2/
> >> >
> >> > Please vote:
> >> >
> >> > +1 lets rock
> >> > 0 indifferent
> >> > -1 Not ready, because...
> >> >
> >> > Best of luck to us ;)
> >> >
> >> > ~Prescott
> >> >
> 		 	   		  
Mime
View raw message