lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2
Date Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:24:12 GMT
It doesn't stop the binaries from being released. They passed the vote, they have passed substantial
community review. Ideally we have a perfect release, but there are always bugs. This is not
a show stopper. We can put out a hot fix for this or roll it into 3.6 imo.


> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:35:51 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2
> From: itamar@code972.com
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> 
> Prescott, doesn't this bug report invalidate the vote? I mean, it does mean
> one of the issues we had for this release is still open?
> 
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
> 
> > Alright, times up - looks like we just passssed for RC2 (3 PMC +1s)  - but
> > we got a number of votes for RC1 which on the whole is roughly the same.
> >
> > Congrats to everyone who helped make 3.0.3 successful.
> >
> > I'll be moving the binaries to distribution and upgrading the nuget
> > packages later this evening
> >
> > ~Prescott
> > ----------------------------------------
> > > From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
> > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > > Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2
> > > Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 17:25:19 -0700
> > >
> > > Alright, updated the source files, recompiled the binaries, and included
> > the nuget packages I'll be using to upload for inspection:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/3.0.3-RC2/
> > >
> > > Please vote:
> > >
> > > +1 lets rock
> > > 0 indifferent
> > > -1 Not ready, because...
> > >
> > > Best of luck to us ;)
> > >
> > > ~Prescott
> >
 		 	   		  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message