lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ilia Nazarov <inaza...@colddata.com>
Subject RE: 3.0.3
Date Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:31:09 GMT
Same problem here.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Foster [mailto:ben@planetcloud.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:15 AM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3.0.3

Guys, what's the unsubscribe email? Tried 2 different addresses that I found
online, both of which don't appear to have worked.
-----Original Message-----
From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:05:30
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org<dev@lucenenet.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: 3.0.3

Yes please with RAT. Im cutting the RC for a vote as soon as itamar says go

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Michael Herndon
Sent: 9/13/2012 9:00 AM
To: Itamar Syn-Hershko; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: 3.0.3

We've gotten a question or two about this on twitter. Let me know when
you guys push. @p do you still need help with RAT?

Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Itamar Syn-Hershko
Sent: 9/9/2012 7:34 PM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3.0.3
Since this have been delayed thus far, if we can release 3.0.3 next Monday
that would be great - I'll be able to push a couple of more last minute bug
fixes to the spatial module, and also merge trunk with the working branch.

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Prescott Nasser
<geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:

> If you guys have time could you merge them into 3.0.3. Unless someone has
> objections, I'm going to cut the artifacts in the next day or so. We've
> kind of pushed this off long enough for the "last little fix", at this
> point what's left can come in 3.6 imo
> ~P
>
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:14:18 +0200
> > From: sisve@devhost.se
> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: 3.0.3
> >
> > I've been using the 3.0.3 packages for some time without any problems.
> >
> > There were some commits to the trunk for LUCENENET-504
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-504> and LUCENENET-506
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-506> which could be
> > applied to the 3.0.3-branch. They both affect the FastVectorHighlighter,
> > adding support for more query-types. I'm not sure if they should be
> > applied to the 3.0.3-release since they have had very little testing, on
> > the other hand, how much more testing will the FastVectorHighlighter get
> > for the 3.6-release?
> >
> > On 2012-09-03 19:10, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Alright, I'm back from vacation - are we happy enough with the 3.0.3
> nuget packages? It looks like no other adjustments were made to the 3.0.3
> branch. Should we cut the release artifacts? ~P
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message