lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Currens <currens.ch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 3.0.3
Date Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:14:42 GMT
I think it was intended for work to be done in the 3.0.3 branch, but
work was actually done in trunk.  I would double check that there are
no lingering commits in the 3.0.3 branch that aren't in trunk, or I
would just merge trunk into 3.0.3 and cut it from that.

I have a feeling that there might be commits present in one and not the other.


Thanks,
Christopher

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com> wrote:
> We can do extra releases of contrib as it gets updated. Great work Itamar, this will
be a great addition.  Quick question to everyone before I cut the code - I notice the updates
Itamar made were to trunk, if I branch the trunk to a new 3.0.3 and wipe out the current branch
will that work? Or were there specifics things put in place in 3.0.3 that never made it to
trunk for some reason?
>  > Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:06:15 +0200
>> Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>> From: itamar@code972.com
>> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>>
>> Everything works great and as far as I'm concerned we are up for a release
>>
>> That being said, the spatial module is still being worked on and much is
>> going to change until Lucene 4 will be released. We probably want to issue
>> another 3.0.3 release for the spatial module once significant changes are
>> made to it?
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>wrote:
>>
>> > OK I'm doing with the porting work, and all tests pass but 1 in a certain
>> > circumstances. I'll send an email about this in a sec.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> Only started working. will complete during the weekend
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Itamar - you happy with the commits? or do you need more time?
>> >>>  > From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
>> >>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> >>> > Subject: RE: 3.0.3
>> >>> > Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:51:07 -0700
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Alright, sorry - just got home, doing this was first on my list..
>> >>> >  > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:50:24 +0300
>> >>> > > Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>> >>> > > From: itamar@code972.com
>> >>> > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > No matter, I'm good now. Thanks..
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Prescott Nasser <
>> >>> geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > > If nobody beats me to it, ill do it tonight
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Sent from my Windows Phone
>> >>> > > > ________________________________
>> >>> > > > From: Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> >>> > > > Sent: 9/19/2012 1:05 PM
>> >>> > > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> >>> > > > Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Still having hard time getting my environment setup.
Can any of
>> >>> you guys
>> >>> > > > with commit karma commit a small change to one of the
files in
>> >>> trunk (add a
>> >>> > > > row to .gitignore or something), this should resolve
some issue
>> >>> I'm having.
>> >>> > > > Thanks :)
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko
<
>> >>> itamar@code972.com
>> >>> > > > >wrote:
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > > Due to the SVN change my local repos were invalidated,
been
>> >>> re-cloning
>> >>> > > > for
>> >>> > > > > the past 12 hours and still not completed.
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > > This will have to be delayed a couple more days,
sorry about
>> >>> that.
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko
<
>> >>> itamar@code972.com
>> >>> > > > >wrote:
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > >> Lol
>> >>> > > > >>
>> >>> > > > >> Prescott, I should have it all for you by Monday
>> >>> > > > >>
>> >>> > > > >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Prescott Nasser
<
>> >>> geobmx540@hotmail.com
>> >>> > > > >wrote:
>> >>> > > > >>
>> >>> > > > >>> pos - I have a mental image of playing chess
with you all as
>> >>> the pieces
>> >>> > > > >>> now..
>> >>> > > > >>>
>> >>> > > > >>> > Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:49:42 -0700
>> >>> > > > >>> > Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>> >>> > > > >>> > From: currens.chris@gmail.com
>> >>> > > > >>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> >>> > > > >>> >
>> >>> > > > >>> > I get why svn and website needed to
move, but why did you
>> >>> move Itamar
>> >>> > > > >>> as
>> >>> > > > >>> > well?  IGNORE ME.  That was a terrible
joke.  English is fun.
>> >>> > > > >>> >
>> >>> > > > >>> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Prescott
Nasser <
>> >>> > > > >>> geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
>> >>> > > > >>> >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > Itamar, svn and website are moved.
I have artifacts more
>> >>> or less
>> >>> > > > >>> ready to
>> >>> > > > >>> > > roll - where do you stand with
the Spatial updates? Should
>> >>> we wait
>> >>> > > > a
>> >>> > > > >>> bit to
>> >>> > > > >>> > > get them or will you need considerable
more time?
>> >>> > > > >>> > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > Subject: RE: 3.0.3
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:54:44
-0700
>> >>> > > > >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > I'm sure at a minimum we'd
need a vote - probably should
>> >>> get
>> >>> > > > >>> community
>> >>> > > > >>> > > consensus as well. At the moment
I'm trying to keep up
>> >>> with all the
>> >>> > > > >>> other
>> >>> > > > >>> > > changes moving from incubator
to a tlp. I'll reach out to
>> >>> infra on
>> >>> > > > >>> the
>> >>> > > > >>> > > process though.
>> >>> > > > >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012
17:43:56 +0300
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > From: itamar@code972.com
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > No JIRA tickets, a couple
of locally fixed bugs, a fix
>> >>> for this
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > issue<
>> >>> > > > >>> > >
>> >>> > > > >>>
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13447823#comment-13447823
>> >>> > > > >>> > > >,
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > and bringing Spatial4n
up to speed with the latest
>> >>> official
>> >>> > > > >>> release of
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > spatial4j. I'm mid-work
on all of those. This is
>> >>> mostly updates
>> >>> > > > >>> but 2
>> >>> > > > >>> > > of
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > the bugs may severely
affect results and sorting.
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > Speaking of SVN - what
would be the process for
>> >>> pushing towards
>> >>> > > > >>> a move
>> >>> > > > >>> > > to
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > git? would we need a
vote?
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012
at 5:36 PM, Prescott Nasser <
>> >>> > > > >>> > > geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > I was going to
put artifacts up for a vote after
>> >>> moving SVN
>> >>> > > > >>> this
>> >>> > > > >>> > > weekend,
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > but found out I
needed INFRA to move it. I was
>> >>> waiting,
>> >>> > > > >>> because we
>> >>> > > > >>> > > have
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > some links in the
help files that I didn't want to
>> >>> update
>> >>> > > > >>> without
>> >>> > > > >>> > > the new
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > svn set.
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > Do you have JIRA
tickets for the bugs? How severe
>> >>> are they? I
>> >>> > > > >>> guess
>> >>> > > > >>> > > we
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > could wait, anyone
else have opinions?
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > Date: Mon,
10 Sep 2012 02:33:59 +0300
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > Subject: Re:
3.0.3
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > From: itamar@code972.com
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > Since this
have been delayed thus far, if we can
>> >>> release
>> >>> > > > >>> 3.0.3 next
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > Monday
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > that would
be great - I'll be able to push a
>> >>> couple of more
>> >>> > > > >>> last
>> >>> > > > >>> > > minute
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > bug
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > fixes to the
spatial module, and also merge trunk
>> >>> with the
>> >>> > > > >>> working
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > branch.
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > On Tue, Sep
4, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Prescott Nasser <
>> >>> > > > >>> > > geobmx540@hotmail.com
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > >wrote:
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > If you
guys have time could you merge them into
>> >>> 3.0.3.
>> >>> > > > >>> Unless
>> >>> > > > >>> > > someone
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > has
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > objections,
I'm going to cut the artifacts in
>> >>> the next
>> >>> > > > day
>> >>> > > > >>> or
>> >>> > > > >>> > > so. We've
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > kind
of pushed this off long enough for the
>> >>> "last little
>> >>> > > > >>> fix",
>> >>> > > > >>> > > at this
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > point
what's left can come in 3.6 imo
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > ~P
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:14:18 +0200
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
From: sisve@devhost.se
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
I've been using the 3.0.3 packages for some
>> >>> time
>> >>> > > > without
>> >>> > > > >>> any
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > problems.
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
There were some commits to the trunk for
>> >>> LUCENENET-504
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
<
>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-504>
>> >>> > > > >>> and
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > LUCENENET-506
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
<
>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-506>
>> >>> > > > >>> which
>> >>> > > > >>> > > could be
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
applied to the 3.0.3-branch. They both affect
>> >>> the
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > FastVectorHighlighter,
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
adding support for more query-types. I'm not
>> >>> sure if
>> >>> > > > they
>> >>> > > > >>> > > should be
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
applied to the 3.0.3-release since they have
>> >>> had very
>> >>> > > > >>> little
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > testing, on
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
the other hand, how much more testing will the
>> >>> > > > >>> > > FastVectorHighlighter
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > get
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
for the 3.6-release?
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
On 2012-09-03 19:10, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> Alright, I'm back from vacation - are we
>> >>> happy enough
>> >>> > > > >>> with
>> >>> > > > >>> > > the
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > 3.0.3
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > nuget
packages? It looks like no other
>> >>> adjustments were
>> >>> > > > >>> made to
>> >>> > > > >>> > > the
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > 3.0.3
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > branch.
Should we cut the release artifacts? ~P
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > >
>> >>> > > > >>> > >
>> >>> > > > >>>
>> >>> > > > >>>
>> >>> > > > >>
>> >>> > > > >>
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>

Mime
View raw message