lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: 3.0.3
Date Sun, 09 Sep 2012 23:33:59 GMT
Since this have been delayed thus far, if we can release 3.0.3 next Monday
that would be great - I'll be able to push a couple of more last minute bug
fixes to the spatial module, and also merge trunk with the working branch.

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:

> If you guys have time could you merge them into 3.0.3. Unless someone has
> objections, I'm going to cut the artifacts in the next day or so. We've
> kind of pushed this off long enough for the "last little fix", at this
> point what's left can come in 3.6 imo
> ~P
>
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:14:18 +0200
> > From: sisve@devhost.se
> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: 3.0.3
> >
> > I've been using the 3.0.3 packages for some time without any problems.
> >
> > There were some commits to the trunk for LUCENENET-504
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-504> and LUCENENET-506
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-506> which could be
> > applied to the 3.0.3-branch. They both affect the FastVectorHighlighter,
> > adding support for more query-types. I'm not sure if they should be
> > applied to the 3.0.3-release since they have had very little testing, on
> > the other hand, how much more testing will the FastVectorHighlighter get
> > for the 3.6-release?
> >
> > On 2012-09-03 19:10, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Alright, I'm back from vacation - are we happy enough with the 3.0.3
> nuget packages? It looks like no other adjustments were made to the 3.0.3
> branch. Should we cut the release artifacts? ~P
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message