lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: 3.6
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:32:10 GMT
This is why they invented git :)

https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/compare/5261b571...e4402c22c

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Christopher Currens <
currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not much of an SVN guy myself, so what I wound up doing was pulling
> down the two branches and used windiff on the actual directories.  I could
> quickly see which files were added, removed, changed, or untouched.  I
> guess you could do the same things with SVN probably, but I don't know how
> or if it is a painless process or not.
>
> The biggest thing would be having multiple people working on and dividing
> up the work.  A lot of times, you have classes that span namespaces, so I
> guess you'd have to have a policy where you'd stick to a namespace and if
> you require something that someone else is porting, just stub it out for
> later.
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > What was your strategy for upgrading? Just getting a list of all the svn
> > changes between 3.0.3 tag and 3.6? I'm terrible with SVN, but is there an
> > easy way to compare the tags? (I feel like there must be)
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:02:33 -0700
> > > Subject: Re: 3.6
> > > From: currens.chris@gmail.com
> > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > >
> > > I used 2.9.4 as a base.  Some files were so bad, though, that I ported
> > them
> > > from scratch.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> geobmx540@hotmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > As 3.0.3 is more or less ready to release, I want to talk quickly
> about
> > > > 3.6. For 3.0.3 Chris did a herculean job creating the initial code
> > base -
> > > > Chris, did you take the java code and port it all? or did you use
> 2.9.4
> > > > and update the code base?
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message