lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: 3.0.3
Date Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:31:10 GMT
OK I'm doing with the porting work, and all tests pass but 1 in a certain
circumstances. I'll send an email about this in a sec.

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>wrote:

> Only started working. will complete during the weekend
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Itamar - you happy with the commits? or do you need more time?
>>  > From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> > Subject: RE: 3.0.3
>> > Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:51:07 -0700
>> >
>> > Alright, sorry - just got home, doing this was first on my list..
>> >  > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:50:24 +0300
>> > > Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>> > > From: itamar@code972.com
>> > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> > >
>> > > No matter, I'm good now. Thanks..
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Prescott Nasser <
>> geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > If nobody beats me to it, ill do it tonight
>> > > >
>> > > > Sent from my Windows Phone
>> > > > ________________________________
>> > > > From: Itamar Syn-Hershko
>> > > > Sent: 9/19/2012 1:05 PM
>> > > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> > > > Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>> > > >
>> > > > Still having hard time getting my environment setup. Can any of you
>> guys
>> > > > with commit karma commit a small change to one of the files in
>> trunk (add a
>> > > > row to .gitignore or something), this should resolve some issue I'm
>> having.
>> > > > Thanks :)
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
>> itamar@code972.com
>> > > > >wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Due to the SVN change my local repos were invalidated, been
>> re-cloning
>> > > > for
>> > > > > the past 12 hours and still not completed.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This will have to be delayed a couple more days, sorry about
that.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
>> itamar@code972.com
>> > > > >wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Lol
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Prescott, I should have it all for you by Monday
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Prescott Nasser <
>> geobmx540@hotmail.com
>> > > > >wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> pos - I have a mental image of playing chess with you
all as
>> the pieces
>> > > > >>> now..
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> > Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:49:42 -0700
>> > > > >>> > Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>> > > > >>> > From: currens.chris@gmail.com
>> > > > >>> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > I get why svn and website needed to move, but why
did you
>> move Itamar
>> > > > >>> as
>> > > > >>> > well?  IGNORE ME.  That was a terrible joke.  English
is fun.
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Prescott Nasser
<
>> > > > >>> geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > > Itamar, svn and website are moved. I have artifacts
more or
>> less
>> > > > >>> ready to
>> > > > >>> > > roll - where do you stand with the Spatial
updates? Should
>> we wait
>> > > > a
>> > > > >>> bit to
>> > > > >>> > > get them or will you need considerable more
time?
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > > > From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
>> > > > >>> > > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> > > > >>> > > > Subject: RE: 3.0.3
>> > > > >>> > > > Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:54:44 -0700
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > I'm sure at a minimum we'd need a vote
- probably should
>> get
>> > > > >>> community
>> > > > >>> > > consensus as well. At the moment I'm trying
to keep up with
>> all the
>> > > > >>> other
>> > > > >>> > > changes moving from incubator to a tlp. I'll
reach out to
>> infra on
>> > > > >>> the
>> > > > >>> > > process though.
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:43:56 +0300
>> > > > >>> > > > > Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>> > > > >>> > > > > From: itamar@code972.com
>> > > > >>> > > > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > No JIRA tickets, a couple of locally
fixed bugs, a fix
>> for this
>> > > > >>> > > > > issue<
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>>
>> > > >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13447823#comment-13447823
>> > > > >>> > > >,
>> > > > >>> > > > > and bringing Spatial4n up to speed
with the latest
>> official
>> > > > >>> release of
>> > > > >>> > > > > spatial4j. I'm mid-work on all of
those. This is mostly
>> updates
>> > > > >>> but 2
>> > > > >>> > > of
>> > > > >>> > > > > the bugs may severely affect results
and sorting.
>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > Speaking of SVN - what would be the
process for pushing
>> towards
>> > > > >>> a move
>> > > > >>> > > to
>> > > > >>> > > > > git? would we need a vote?
>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:36 PM,
Prescott Nasser <
>> > > > >>> > > geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > I was going to put artifacts
up for a vote after
>> moving SVN
>> > > > >>> this
>> > > > >>> > > weekend,
>> > > > >>> > > > > > but found out I needed INFRA
to move it. I was
>> waiting,
>> > > > >>> because we
>> > > > >>> > > have
>> > > > >>> > > > > > some links in the help files
that I didn't want to
>> update
>> > > > >>> without
>> > > > >>> > > the new
>> > > > >>> > > > > > svn set.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > Do you have JIRA tickets for
the bugs? How severe are
>> they? I
>> > > > >>> guess
>> > > > >>> > > we
>> > > > >>> > > > > > could wait, anyone else have
opinions?
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012
02:33:59 +0300
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > From: itamar@code972.com
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > Since this have been delayed
thus far, if we can
>> release
>> > > > >>> 3.0.3 next
>> > > > >>> > > > > > Monday
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > that would be great - I'll
be able to push a couple
>> of more
>> > > > >>> last
>> > > > >>> > > minute
>> > > > >>> > > > > > bug
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > fixes to the spatial module,
and also merge trunk
>> with the
>> > > > >>> working
>> > > > >>> > > > > > branch.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at
10:29 PM, Prescott Nasser <
>> > > > >>> > > geobmx540@hotmail.com
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > If you guys have time
could you merge them into
>> 3.0.3.
>> > > > >>> Unless
>> > > > >>> > > someone
>> > > > >>> > > > > > has
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > objections, I'm going
to cut the artifacts in the
>> next
>> > > > day
>> > > > >>> or
>> > > > >>> > > so. We've
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > kind of pushed this
off long enough for the "last
>> little
>> > > > >>> fix",
>> > > > >>> > > at this
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > point what's left
can come in 3.6 imo
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > ~P
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Date: Tue, 4
Sep 2012 07:14:18 +0200
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > From: sisve@devhost.se
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re:
3.0.3
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > I've been using
the 3.0.3 packages for some time
>> > > > without
>> > > > >>> any
>> > > > >>> > > > > > problems.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > There were some
commits to the trunk for
>> LUCENENET-504
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-504>
>> > > > >>> and
>> > > > >>> > > > > > LUCENENET-506
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-506>
>> > > > >>> which
>> > > > >>> > > could be
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > applied to the
3.0.3-branch. They both affect
>> the
>> > > > >>> > > > > > FastVectorHighlighter,
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > adding support
for more query-types. I'm not
>> sure if
>> > > > they
>> > > > >>> > > should be
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > applied to the
3.0.3-release since they have
>> had very
>> > > > >>> little
>> > > > >>> > > > > > testing, on
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > the other hand,
how much more testing will the
>> > > > >>> > > FastVectorHighlighter
>> > > > >>> > > > > > get
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > for the 3.6-release?
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > On 2012-09-03
19:10, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Alright,
I'm back from vacation - are we
>> happy enough
>> > > > >>> with
>> > > > >>> > > the
>> > > > >>> > > > > > 3.0.3
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > nuget packages? It
looks like no other
>> adjustments were
>> > > > >>> made to
>> > > > >>> > > the
>> > > > >>> > > > > > 3.0.3
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > branch. Should we
cut the release artifacts? ~P
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message