lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1391054 - /lucene.net/branches/3.0.3-2/
Date Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:39:50 GMT
Since the spatial contrib comes in two flavors (with and without NTS
support), and each has dependencies on other nuget packages (the NTS
version having multiple), I'd suggest we have a separate packages for it
(Lucene.Spatial and Lucene.Spatial.NTS), even if the rest of the contribs
are released as one package.

It makes the most sense, really.

Once this is agreed upon I can prepare the nuspecs

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Christopher Currens <
currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:

> Trunk is now up to date with all 3.0.3 changes.  All work was being
> done there, and not in the branch, so it made more sense (and was
> considerably easier) to merge the changes into trunk instead of the
> branch.  We should probably delete the other 2 branches and create a
> spinoff 3.0.3 branch when we've actually released for
> bugfixes/changes.
>
> Also, I had a question about packaging.  All of the build scripts and
> projects have been updated to have the correct naming and include
> spatial...however, the spatial libraries rely on spatial4n, but that
> library is not included in any of the nuget packages, listed as an
> external reference, or added as an embedded resource of the actual
> library.  I'm assuming this has to be done for them to work properly.
> How should that be done?  Included in the contrib and spatial.NTS
> nuget packages or as an external nuget package reference?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Christopher
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Christopher Currens
> <currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There are so few changes in the 3.0.3 branch that aren't present in
> > trunk.  From what I see, there are only three changesets.
> >
> > * Update version number in AssemblyInfo.cs changes for contrib projects
> > * Update build scripts/projects with consistent names for contrib
> projects
> > * Cleaning and updated TXT files in the trunk.
> >
> > I think it would be easier to selectively merge those changes into
> > trunk, instead of trying to merge trunk into the branch, especially
> > considering that trunk is the latest version of 3.0.3, and not the
> > branch.  I'll work on this today and get this ready.  I need to make
> > sure that the scripts and projects merged correctly anyway, otherwise
> > you're not going to be able to produce any build artifacts.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Christopher Currens
> > <currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I created a branch from a revision that is pre-merge...I'm trying to
> >> get a good clue of what is different between the two branches.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> careful with 3.0.3, it's still screwy from when I tried to merge
> changes from the trunk into it.
> >>>
> >>>> Subject: svn commit: r1391054 - /lucene.net/branches/3.0.3-2/
> >>>> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:20:42 +0000
> >>>> To: commits@lucenenet.apache.org
> >>>> From: ccurrens@apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>> Author: ccurrens
> >>>> Date: Thu Sep 27 15:20:42 2012
> >>>> New Revision: 1391054
> >>>>
> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1391054&view=rev
> >>>> Log: (empty)
> >>>>
> >>>> Added:
> >>>>     lucene.net/branches/3.0.3-2/   (props changed)
> >>>>       - copied from r1383623, lucene.net/branches/3.0.3/
> >>>>
> >>>> Propchange: lucene.net/branches/3.0.3-2/
> >>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> --- svn:mergeinfo (added)
> >>>> +++ svn:mergeinfo Thu Sep 27 15:20:42 2012
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> >>>> +/incubator/
> lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net.3.0.3/trunk:1199075-1294851*
> >>>> +/incubator/lucene.net/trunk:1199072-1294798*
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message