lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ilia Nazarov <inaza...@colddata.com>
Subject RE: 3.0.3
Date Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:44:29 GMT
1. Sent to 'dev-unsubscribe@lucenenet.apache.org' and received back:



was not on the dev mailing list when I received

your request and is not a subscriber of this list.



2. Sent to 'user-unsubscribe@lucenenet.apache.org', got a response back
with instructions to send email to
'user-uc.1347476082.ekljjlbbgpdgcocicfgh-inazarov=
colddata.com@lucenenet.apache.org'. Did that and still receive emails.







-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Svensson [mailto:sisve@devhost.se]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:33 AM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3.0.3



What addresses have you sent a mail to, and did you receive any response

at all?



On 2012-09-13 19:31, Ilia Nazarov wrote:

> Same problem here.

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Ben Foster [mailto:ben@planetcloud.co.uk]

> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:15 AM

> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org

> Subject: Re: 3.0.3

>

> Guys, what's the unsubscribe email? Tried 2 different addresses that I
found

> online, both of which don't appear to have worked.

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>

> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:05:30

> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org<dev@lucenenet.apache.org>

> Reply-To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org

> Subject: RE: 3.0.3

>

> Yes please with RAT. Im cutting the RC for a vote as soon as itamar says
go

>

> Sent from my Windows Phone

> ________________________________

> From: Michael Herndon

> Sent: 9/13/2012 9:00 AM

> To: Itamar Syn-Hershko; dev@lucenenet.apache.org

> Subject: RE: 3.0.3

>

> We've gotten a question or two about this on twitter. Let me know when

> you guys push. @p do you still need help with RAT?

>

> Sent from my Windows Phone

> From: Itamar Syn-Hershko

> Sent: 9/9/2012 7:34 PM

> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org

> Subject: Re: 3.0.3

> Since this have been delayed thus far, if we can release 3.0.3 next Monday

> that would be great - I'll be able to push a couple of more last minute
bug

> fixes to the spatial module, and also merge trunk with the working branch.

>

> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Prescott Nasser

> <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:

>

>> If you guys have time could you merge them into 3.0.3. Unless someone has

>> objections, I'm going to cut the artifacts in the next day or so. We've

>> kind of pushed this off long enough for the "last little fix", at this

>> point what's left can come in 3.6 imo

>> ~P

>>

>>

>>

>>> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:14:18 +0200

>>> From: sisve@devhost.se

>>> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org

>>> Subject: Re: 3.0.3

>>>

>>> I've been using the 3.0.3 packages for some time without any problems.

>>>

>>> There were some commits to the trunk for LUCENENET-504

>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-504> and LUCENENET-506

>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-506> which could be

>>> applied to the 3.0.3-branch. They both affect the FastVectorHighlighter,

>>> adding support for more query-types. I'm not sure if they should be

>>> applied to the 3.0.3-release since they have had very little testing, on

>>> the other hand, how much more testing will the FastVectorHighlighter get

>>> for the 3.6-release?

>>>

>>> On 2012-09-03 19:10, Prescott Nasser wrote:

>>>>

>>>> Alright, I'm back from vacation - are we happy enough with the 3.0.3

>> nuget packages? It looks like no other adjustments were made to the 3.0.3

>> branch. Should we cut the release artifacts? ~P

>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message