lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Svensson <si...@devhost.se>
Subject Re: 3.0.3
Date Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:02:36 GMT
I've committed the mentioned FastVectorHighlighter-fixes to the 3.0.3 
branch and set the fix-version in jira to 3.0.3 for these issues.

On 2012-09-04 21:29, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> If you guys have time could you merge them into 3.0.3. Unless someone has objections,
I'm going to cut the artifacts in the next day or so. We've kind of pushed this off long enough
for the "last little fix", at this point what's left can come in 3.6 imo
> ~P
>
>
>
>> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:14:18 +0200
>> From: sisve@devhost.se
>> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>>
>> I've been using the 3.0.3 packages for some time without any problems.
>>
>> There were some commits to the trunk for LUCENENET-504
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-504> and LUCENENET-506
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-506> which could be
>> applied to the 3.0.3-branch. They both affect the FastVectorHighlighter,
>> adding support for more query-types. I'm not sure if they should be
>> applied to the 3.0.3-release since they have had very little testing, on
>> the other hand, how much more testing will the FastVectorHighlighter get
>> for the 3.6-release?
>>
>> On 2012-09-03 19:10, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>>>
>>> Alright, I'm back from vacation - are we happy enough with the 3.0.3 nuget packages?
It looks like no other adjustments were made to the 3.0.3 branch. Should we cut the release
artifacts? ~P 		 	   		
>   		 	   		


Mime
View raw message