lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ben Foster" <...@planetcloud.co.uk>
Subject Re: 3.0.3
Date Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:42:42 GMT
unsubscribe-dev@lucenenet.apache.org and
lucene-net-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org

Both responded with address doesn't exist (of some flavour)


-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Svensson <sisve@devhost.se>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:33:12 
To: <dev@lucenenet.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3.0.3

What addresses have you sent a mail to, and did you receive any response 
at all?

On 2012-09-13 19:31, Ilia Nazarov wrote:
> Same problem here.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Foster [mailto:ben@planetcloud.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:15 AM
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>
> Guys, what's the unsubscribe email? Tried 2 different addresses that I found
> online, both of which don't appear to have worked.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:05:30
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org<dev@lucenenet.apache.org>
> Reply-To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> Subject: RE: 3.0.3
>
> Yes please with RAT. Im cutting the RC for a vote as soon as itamar says go
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Michael Herndon
> Sent: 9/13/2012 9:00 AM
> To: Itamar Syn-Hershko; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> Subject: RE: 3.0.3
>
> We've gotten a question or two about this on twitter. Let me know when
> you guys push. @p do you still need help with RAT?
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> From: Itamar Syn-Hershko
> Sent: 9/9/2012 7:34 PM
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 3.0.3
> Since this have been delayed thus far, if we can release 3.0.3 next Monday
> that would be great - I'll be able to push a couple of more last minute bug
> fixes to the spatial module, and also merge trunk with the working branch.
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Prescott Nasser
> <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> If you guys have time could you merge them into 3.0.3. Unless someone has
>> objections, I'm going to cut the artifacts in the next day or so. We've
>> kind of pushed this off long enough for the "last little fix", at this
>> point what's left can come in 3.6 imo
>> ~P
>>
>>
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:14:18 +0200
>>> From: sisve@devhost.se
>>> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: 3.0.3
>>>
>>> I've been using the 3.0.3 packages for some time without any problems.
>>>
>>> There were some commits to the trunk for LUCENENET-504
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-504> and LUCENENET-506
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-506> which could be
>>> applied to the 3.0.3-branch. They both affect the FastVectorHighlighter,
>>> adding support for more query-types. I'm not sure if they should be
>>> applied to the 3.0.3-release since they have had very little testing, on
>>> the other hand, how much more testing will the FastVectorHighlighter get
>>> for the 3.6-release?
>>>
>>> On 2012-09-03 19:10, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Alright, I'm back from vacation - are we happy enough with the 3.0.3
>> nuget packages? It looks like no other adjustments were made to the 3.0.3
>> branch. Should we cut the release artifacts? ~P
>>

Mime
View raw message