lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christopher Currens (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Resolved] (LUCENENET-487) Remove Obsolete Members, Fields that are marked as obsolete and to be removed in 3.0
Date Thu, 07 Jun 2012 17:04:23 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Christopher Currens resolved LUCENENET-487.
-------------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 3.0.3

I did a quick search across the source in Lucene, and I think the LongParser and DoubleParser
are the only two items in the entire source, marked obsoleted for removal in 3.0.  There is
one other object that is marked Obsolete to be removed in 3.x, but it is still in the 3.0.3
java code.

I'm going to remove the obsolete attributes from those two interfaces listed, because of the
differences of java and C# (not .NET), we can't match this API.  Specifically, this reason
is because even though Java and .NET allow static members and nested types (both static and
instance types), it's invalid C# code, since it doesn't support it.

Either way, since we can't conform to the exact API that java does for the FieldCache, it
wouldn't be a bad idea to clean it up.
                
> Remove Obsolete Members, Fields that are marked as obsolete and to be removed in 3.0
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-487
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-487
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 3.0.3
>            Reporter: Prescott Nasser
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Lucene.Net 3.0.3
>
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> We have several places where things are marked as obsolete and to be removed in 3.0.
We should remove those. Also, care should be taken to comment what was removed (and what should
be used in it's place), so that we can have complete and quality release notes.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message