lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Currens <currens.ch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Merging 3.0.3 into Trunk
Date Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:18:17 GMT
I agree with Prescott.  Make a patch for that sucker! :)


Thanks,
Christopher

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:

> Jira and then just submit your own patch imo
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Stefan Bodewig
> Sent: 3/1/2012 7:23 AM
> To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Merging 3.0.3 into Trunk
>
> On 2012-02-29, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> > On 2012-02-28, Christopher Currens wrote:
>
> >> Alright, it's done!  3.0.3 is now merged in with Trunk!
>
> > I'll see to running RAT and looking at the line-ends over the next few
> > days so we can get them fixed once and not run into it with the release.
>
> I went for EOLs first and there are 621 files outside of lib and doc
> that need to be fixed.  What I have now is not just a patch (of more
> than 200k lines), but also a list of 621 files that need their
> svn:eol-style property to be set.
>
> I can create a JIRA ticket for that attaching my patch and the list of
> files to fix or - since I technically am a committer - could just commit
> my cleaned up workspace as is (plus JIRA ticket that I'd open and close
> myself).
>
> What would you prefer?
>
> RAT doesn't really make sense before the line feeds are correct (I've
> seen quite a few files without license headers by manual inspection).
>
> Stefan
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message