lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Currens <currens.ch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] 3.0.3
Date Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:37:48 GMT
I can only guarantee that these 31 bugs here (in the 3.0.3 version):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/CHANGES.txt are
part of the code.  I mean, it's possible that other's are, but we'd really
need to check the others listed there to be sure that they are also
included.  However, that's only a difference of 9 bugs, so I think we're
very close to a 3.0.3 release, depending on how many issues we want to get
done that related to changing the API.



Thanks,
Christopher

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:

>
> So, Chris if you did this as a direct port of the java version (
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/), Does
> that mean that all of the LUCENE JIRA issues (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+LUCENE+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%223.0.3%22+AND+status+%3D+Closed+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide)
> are part of this code already? That would make 3.0.3 well on it's way to
> release... ~P
>  > From: bodewig@apache.org
> > To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:35:25 +0100
> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 3.0.3
> >
> > On 2012-01-25, Michael Herndon wrote:
> >
> > > Do we have a standard of copy or tag of Java's version source that
> we're
> > > doing a compare against?  I only see the 3_1 and above in the tags.
> >
> > Likely because the svn location has changed in between.  I think it must
> > be <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/>
> >
> > Stefan
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message