lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Currens <currens.ch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] 3.0.3
Date Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:46:58 GMT
2653, 2055, 2776, 2732, 2688, 2616, 2524, 2398, 2284, 2278, 2277, and 2249
are all on JIRA that aren't on that list in the CHANGES.txt file.  It looks
like that file in SVN has some issues that aren't listen in JIRA.  Anyway,
it's possible that those issues listed here have already been ported as
part of that changeset.  I'm basing that on the fact that the last time
these bugs were updated was Dec 1st 2010, which was before the code was
released.  However, we should still check to make sure.

Thanks,
Christopher

On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Christopher Currens <
currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:

> I can only guarantee that these 31 bugs here (in the 3.0.3 version):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/CHANGES.txt are
> part of the code.  I mean, it's possible that other's are, but we'd really
> need to check the others listed there to be sure that they are also
> included.  However, that's only a difference of 9 bugs, so I think we're
> very close to a 3.0.3 release, depending on how many issues we want to get
> done that related to changing the API.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Christopher
>
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> So, Chris if you did this as a direct port of the java version (
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/), Does
>> that mean that all of the LUCENE JIRA issues (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+LUCENE+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%223.0.3%22+AND+status+%3D+Closed+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide)
>> are part of this code already? That would make 3.0.3 well on it's way to
>> release... ~P
>>  > From: bodewig@apache.org
>> > To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:35:25 +0100
>> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 3.0.3
>> >
>> > On 2012-01-25, Michael Herndon wrote:
>> >
>> > > Do we have a standard of copy or tag of Java's version source that
>> we're
>> > > doing a compare against?  I only see the 3_1 and above in the tags.
>> >
>> > Likely because the svn location has changed in between.  I think it must
>> > be <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/>
>> >
>> > Stefan
>>
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message