lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other forward progress
Date Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:22:59 GMT

That's 40 issues that the Java Lucene team tagged as needed for 3.0.3 release (so they are
all closed atm) I will try to port many/most of these over this week into our JIRA so we can
track them for ourselves.

 

 

 

 ---------------------------------------- > From: geobmx540@hotmail.com > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:21:39 -0800 > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into
trunk and other forward progress > > > 40 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+LUCENE+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%223.0.3%22+AND+status+%3D+Closed+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
> > > > > > Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:18:22 -0800 > > From: codekaizen@gmail.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3
into trunk and other forward progress > > > > I'm not that proficient in JIRA
yet, and can only find 22 open issues > > outstanding. Is this correct, or am I missing
something? > > > > -r > > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Prescott
Nasser wrote: > > > > > You can look at the jira issues for Java lucene 3.0.3
and submit patches > > > for 2.9.4g that will bring it up. Worst case is well keep
trying to > > > maintain a line by line and the g. Best case is we can use g as a
jump > > > point to make it even more .net like and whatever work you do will help
us > > > there as well > > > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone >
> > ________________________________ > > > From: Rory Plaire > > >
Sent: 12/23/2011 2:27 PM > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > >
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other forward progress > > >
> > > So, if there was a very-occasional contributor who wanted to put some time
> > > into the project this weekend, is there a way to do it at this time? > >
> I'm only interested in the generics port as well as making sure that the > > >
translation offers (at least one-way) compatibility with Lucene indexes. > > > -r
> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Prescott Nasser > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > I don't know if we should do that - the generics is quite
different from > > > > the line by line port. I would vote we do it personally
- I know others > > > are > > > > not ok with it. > > > >
> > > > What say other people? > > > > > > > > Sent from
my Windows Phone > > > > ________________________________ > > > >
From: Scott Lombard > > > > Sent: 12/23/2011 11:21 AM > > > > To:
lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3
into trunk and other forward > > > progress > > > > > > > >
The Anonymous class issue is a readability issue not a functional change. > > > >
So the release could go forward without it. The work should be continued > > > >
in > > > > the 3.0.3 version. > > > > > > > > Prescott
are you planning on merging the 2.9.4g into the trunk then > > > 3.0.3? > >
> > > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com] > > >
> > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 4:37 PM > > > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other > >
> > > forward progress > > > > > > > > > > Im not as
familiar with the g branch - the notice issue is > > > > > current, seems like
the general incubator has been digging > > > > > everyone for it lately. >
> > > > > > > > > Im not sure about the anon or the generics unfortunately
> > > > > > > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone > > >
> > ________________________________ > > > > > From: Rory Plaire >
> > > > Sent: 12/22/2011 12:58 PM > > > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other > >
> > > forward progress > > > > > > > > > > I was just
looking at the issues for 2.9.4g since I have a > > > > > bit of time to put
against them in the coming week. They are here: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET/fixforversion/
> > > > > 12316479. Are these current? If so I can just keep going in >
> > > > the direction DIGY set to help close them. > > > > > >
> > > > -r > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011
at 10:12 AM, michael herndon < > > > > > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net>
wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 I believe you tagged the
latest during release. Code be > > > > > reverted > > > > >
> +or a > > > > > > new branch to create a patch for 2.9.4 if something
major happens > > > > > > since we have scm in place, so I think merging
it would not > > > > > be damaging in any way. > > > > > >
> > > > > > for the 2.9.4g branch, I would do a quick scan to see if >
> > > > there are any > > > > > > outstanding tickets or input
from DIGY or anyone else who > > > > > put in major > > > > >
> time on that branch. If there are things that are > > > > > outstanding,
throw > > > > > > together a quick list that people can pull from and work
through. > > > > > > > > > > > > I can throw up some tweets
and point towards this thread if > > > > > you would like. > > > >
> > > > > > > > - Michael > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Prescott
Nasser > > > > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Its been pretty quiet as of late. I'd like to
merge 3.0.3 > > > > > into the > > > > > > > trunk and
wipe out the branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Im going to do this by lazy consensus since responses are > > > > > a little
> > > > > > > difficult to come by. Im going to do this Jan 5th - after
the > > > > > > > holidays to give everyone the opportunity to respond
if > > > > > they think > > > > > > > this is a bad >
> > > > > idea. > > > > > > > I will do it quicker if
people respond it is a good idea however. > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > I am also going to package up 2.9.4g the week between the two > >
> > > > > holidays - if there is anything that needs to get done > >
> > > lets get it taken care of. > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > Finally, if I dont hear any other way in the next day or two I am >
> > > > > > going > > > > > > to > > > > >
> > copy the Java lucene jira issues for 3.0.3 release into > > > > >
our jira so > > > > > > > that > > > > > > we >
> > > > > > can track and start knocking them down. > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Happy holidays all, > > > >
> > > Prescott > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Sent from my Windows Phone > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 		 	   		  
Mime
View raw message