lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rory Plaire <codekai...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other forward progress
Date Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:27:00 GMT
So, if there was a very-occasional contributor who wanted to put some time
into the project this weekend, is there a way to do it at this time?
I'm only interested in the generics port as well as making sure that the
translation offers (at least one-way) compatibility with Lucene indexes.
-r

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:

> I don't know if we should do that - the generics is quite different from
> the line by line port. I would vote we do it personally - I know others are
> not ok with it.
>
> What say other people?
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Scott Lombard
> Sent: 12/23/2011 11:21 AM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other forward progress
>
> The Anonymous class issue is a readability issue not a functional change.
> So the release could go forward without it.  The work should be continued
> in
> the 3.0.3 version.
>
> Prescott are you planning on merging the 2.9.4g into the trunk then 3.0.3?
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 4:37 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other
> > forward progress
> >
> > Im not as familiar with the g branch - the notice issue is
> > current, seems like the general incubator has been digging
> > everyone for it lately.
> >
> > Im not sure about the anon or the generics unfortunately
> >
> > Sent from my Windows Phone
> > ________________________________
> > From: Rory Plaire
> > Sent: 12/22/2011 12:58 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other
> > forward progress
> >
> > I was just looking at the issues for 2.9.4g since I have a
> > bit of time to put against them in the coming week. They are here:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET/fixforversion/
> > 12316479. Are these current? If so I can just keep going in
> > the direction DIGY set to help close them.
> >
> > -r
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:12 AM, michael herndon <
> > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> >
> > > +1  I believe you tagged the latest during release. Code be
> > reverted
> > > +or a
> > > new branch to create a patch for 2.9.4 if something major happens
> > > since we have scm in place, so I think merging it would not
> > be damaging in any way.
> > >
> > > for the 2.9.4g branch, I would do a quick scan to see if
> > there are any
> > > outstanding tickets or input from DIGY or anyone else who
> > put in major
> > > time on that branch. If there are things that are
> > outstanding, throw
> > > together a quick list that people can pull from and work through.
> > >
> > > I can throw up some tweets and point towards this thread if
> > you would like.
> > >
> > > - Michael
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Prescott Nasser
> > > <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Its been pretty quiet as of late. I'd like to merge 3.0.3
> > into the
> > > > trunk and wipe out the branch.
> > > >
> > > > Im going to do this by lazy consensus since responses are
> > a little
> > > > difficult to come by. Im going to do this Jan 5th - after the
> > > > holidays to give everyone the opportunity to respond if
> > they think
> > > > this is a bad
> > > idea.
> > > > I will do it quicker if people respond it is a good idea however.
> > > >
> > > > I am also going to package up 2.9.4g the week between the two
> > > > holidays - if there is anything that needs to get done
> > lets get it taken care of.
> > > >
> > > > Finally, if I dont hear any other way in the next day or two I am
> > > > going
> > > to
> > > > copy the Java lucene jira issues for 3.0.3 release into
> > our jira so
> > > > that
> > > we
> > > > can track and start knocking them down.
> > > >
> > > > Happy holidays all,
> > > > Prescott
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my Windows Phone
> > >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message