lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Chiaretta <simone.chiare...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.net nuget
Date Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:35:21 GMT
Ok, will add the SharpZipLib ... cool thing of Nuget is that we don't have
to add it to our dist.. just add a dependency to the original pkg, so with
its own licenses and requirements.

Changes: fixed some texts in the nuspecs, and added the nuspecs for the old
pgks.
I'll create a JIRA task and attach the changes over there.

I'll let you know as soon as I publish the pkgs

Simo

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:

>
> >
> > Please test them and let me know if you find any problem:
> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5037284/Lucene.net-nuget/Lucene.2.9.4.1.zip
> >
>
>
>
> Looks good
>
>
>
> >
> > I've seen ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib is always included in the bin folder
> > after compiling, but if I'm not wrong it's only needed if compressed
> > indexes are needed: shall I add it as dependency or not?
> >
>
>
> I would say include it, that way everything works "out of the box".
>
>
>
> >
> > I did a few changes: do I create a diff file and send it to someone?
> >
>
>
> What do you mean changes? I guess you could send them to me, or attach
> them to a JIRA
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Simone for tackling this
>
>
>
> ~Prescott
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 00:24:28 +0100
> > From: simone.chiaretta@gmail.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.net nuget
> >
> > So, I created the packages using the binary release available on the
> > official site, but using the XML doc I got for building it on my machine.
> >
> > Please test them and let me know if you find any problem:
> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5037284/Lucene.net-nuget/Lucene.2.9.4.1.zip
> >
> > To test them unzip to file somewhere in your disk, and specify the folder
> > as path for Nuget in the package management settings window.
> >
> > If all is good I'll push them online tomorrow
> >
>
> >
>
> > I noticed not all contrib projects have been released as binary, so I'm
> > including in the contrib pkg only the ones that are part of the binary
> > release on the apache site.
> >
> > I didn't create the sample package with the demo apps because it's just
> the
> > compiled apps, and not of a create use for those who want to study it.
> I'll
> > look into making a proper demo pkg in the next weeks.
> >
> > I've seen ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib is always included in the bin folder
> > after compiling, but if I'm not wrong it's only needed if compressed
> > indexes are needed: shall I add it as dependency or not?
> >
>
> >
> > Finally I needed a logo for the package:
> > I used that one
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/branding/logo/lucene-net-icon-128x128.png
> > But if would be great if it was also somewhere in the public site.
> > For this version I think it's ok to leave it there, but maybe for a next
> > release it would be good to publish it in the website.
> >
>
> >
> > I did a few changes: do I create a diff file and send it to someone?
> >
> > Simone
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Simone Chiaretta <
> > simone.chiaretta@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > maybe I'm missing something, but looks like the snk file for strongly
> > > signing is in the public repo on svn.apache.org
> > >
> > > Simone
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Simone Chiaretta <
> > > simone.chiaretta@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Good... no need to have another key...
> > >> Simo
> > >>
> > >> ---
> > >> Simone Chiaretta
> > >> @simonech
> > >> Sent from a tablet
> > >>
> > >> On 01/dic/2011, at 21:04, Michael Herndon <
> mherndon@wickedsoftware.net>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Keep in mind tho that having the token checked in somewhere in the
> > >> source
> > >> > repository is not a good idea b/c someone could use it and publish
> > >> malware
> > >> > or trojans under your identity. So unless the token is stored
> outside
> > >> the
> > >> > source repository, it's not a good idea to have it in the CI.
> > >> >
> > >> > - stored in an ASF private repo.
> > >> >
> > >> > the a new key probably needs to be generated and stored in the
> private
> > >> ASF
> > >> > repo as well.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > The CI build is at builds.apache.org, however its not complete.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Simone Chiaretta <
> > >> simone.chiaretta@gmail.com
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Mine below
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Michael Herndon <
> > >> >> mherndon@wickedsoftware.net
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Simone Chiaretta <
> > >> >>> simone.chiaretta@gmail.com
> > >> >>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> You mean a different impersonal Nuget account?
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> yes. the goal of the impersonal account was to allow committers
to
> > >> push
> > >> >>> nuget packages in an automated way without the need of having
> their
> > >> own
> > >> >>> account. there was some preliminary work of building nuget
> packages
> > >> using
> > >> >>> the build scripts.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Sorry, I haven't followed a lot lately: at the end, did we end
up
> using
> > >> >> teamcity on codebetter or another build system? I remember there
> were
> > >> >> discussion on that but don't remember how they ended.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> there has been talk on various nuget channels about allowing
> nuget to
> > >> >> have
> > >> >>> --pre tag or having a separate build channel. If you're not
> familiar
> > >> with
> > >> >>> gems/bundler, its basically a way to push packages that are
not
> > >> official
> > >> >>> releases. (nightly, ctp, beta, etc). So in theory the CI could
> build
> > >> >>> packages nightly if the build does not fail into a channels.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> its also helps from an overall branding perspective.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The author that appears on the nuget gallery page can be different
> > >> from the
> > >> >> owner that puts the package online.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> From what I've seen also used in MS pkgs devs have their
in
> accounts
> > >> >> but
> > >> >>>> pkgs have multiple owners.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> If its possible to do so link your account as an owner &
> prescott's
> > >> >> account
> > >> >>> with the impersonal one.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Keep in mind tho that having the token checked in somewhere in
the
> > >> source
> > >> >> repository is not a good idea b/c someone could use it and publish
> > >> malware
> > >> >> or trojans under your identity. So unless the token is stored
> outside
> > >> the
> > >> >> source repository, it's not a good idea to have it in the CI.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> One last thing: I notice that the official lib is strongly named...
> > >> again,
> > >> >> not a good idea to have the key checked in the source control.
I
> guess
> > >> now
> > >> >> someone owns the key for the strong naming and does the signing
> offline
> > >> >> from the CI. Is that correct?
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> But if you want we can also go with the Lucene.net team
account.
> > >> >>>> Simo
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> Simone Chiaretta
> > >> >> Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider
> > >> >> Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz
> > >> >> RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber
> > >> >> twitter: @simonech
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
> magic
> > >> >> "Life is short, play hard"
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Simone Chiaretta
> > > Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider
> > > Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz
> > > RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber
> > > twitter: @simonech
> > >
> > > Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
> > > "Life is short, play hard"
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Simone Chiaretta
> > Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider
> > Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz
> > RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber
> > twitter: @simonech
> >
> > Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
> > "Life is short, play hard"
>



-- 
Simone Chiaretta
Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider
Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz
RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber
twitter: @simonech

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
"Life is short, play hard"

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message