lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Currens <currens.ch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubator-RC2 Documentation
Date Tue, 08 Nov 2011 03:26:23 GMT
I don't understand why we have the rendered html in the docs.  I don't mind
having the .chm rendered and put in the repo, but the entire HTML
documentation spans 8,000 files and over 100mb.  The CHM comes in at around
15mb.

I don't think it's necessary to have both in the repo, but if the consensus
is to keep them both, I think we should bundle the HTML docs in a zip,
instead of being added as loose files, at least in trunk.  I think it's
kinda silly the way it is now, and SVN does better at handling 1 large file
versus 8,000 smaller ones.

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Michael Herndon <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net
> wrote:

> @Stefan.
>
> I wouldn't worry about the taking the blame, you've done plenty to help out
> and there is no way to catch everything. We'll learn as we go.
>
> As svnpub is the only option and since we can't run the binary version that
> uses ASP.NET, we'll need to probably take your suggestion commit the
> smaller chunks of html then.
>
> I'll do it manually this time and see if I can't write a script that
> automates it in the future.
>
> @Chris, thanks for the fixes to the build scripts this weekend.
>
> - Michael
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On 2011-11-07, Michael Herndon wrote:
> >
> > > I can rebuild it, but the trick is replacing the version of it in svn
> so
> > > that it does not cause svnsync and cms to choke. Last time I just
> pushed
> > it
> > > into branch/site/docs.  However, that is not publicly visible for the
> > > incubation website, so Prescott had to do an svn move.
> >
> > When I recommended to do the svn move I didn't realize we were talking
> > about that many files.  I simply didn't check, sorry.
> >
> > > I'm not quite sure how to go about it this time around. I would push it
> > to
> > > jira, but it caps uploads at 10 mb.
> >
> > Then it still had to go to svn in some way.
> >
> > Personally I'm not a friend of generated documents in svn but I'm in a
> > minority here.
> >
> > With svnpubsub being your only option I think the only thing you can do
> > is split the commit into smaller chunks, committing 100 or 200 files at
> > a time.  Maybe infra has better ideas than that, I don't.
> >
> > Stefan
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message