lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Herndon <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubator-RC2 Documentation
Date Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:25:56 GMT
I can rebuild it, but the trick is replacing the version of it in svn so
that it does not cause svnsync and cms to choke. Last time I just pushed it
into branch/site/docs.  However, that is not publicly visible for the
incubation website, so Prescott had to do an svn move.

I'm not quite sure how to go about it this time around. I would push it to
jira, but it caps uploads at 10 mb.  And I definitely don't want to cause
infra any grief.  Thoughts/Suggestions on how to proceed ?


On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Christopher Currens <currens.chris@gmail.com
> wrote:

> I've committed the changes to the xml documentation to the repo.
>
> I built the documentation, but I wasn't sure how Michael packaged the
> documentation in [LUCENENET-452].  If someone could either rebuild the
> documentation or let me know how it was done for the release, then we can
> open it up for another vote to release it.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Christopher
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I dont mind
> >
> > Sent from my Windows Phone
> > ________________________________
> > From: Christopher Currens
> > Sent: 11/4/2011 5:08 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubator-RC2 Documentation
> >
> > A few days ago, after RC1 was put up for a vote to release, I started
> > working on [LUCENENET-438] by cleaning up the documentation.  The current
> > state of the documentation is pretty bad, there are many unconverted
> > remnants of javadoc comments (ie, @link, @see, etc..).  I wanted to do
> this
> > simply to get our documentation up to a more readable level.
> >
> > I had expected this to take quite a long time, but with the magic of
> > regular expressions and find and replace, I'm nearly done with the
> > conversion, this all on the heels of the RC2 that was just put up to
> vote.
> >  I will probably wind up finishing the cleanup of the documentation
> > comments before Monday.  I would have said something earlier had I known
> it
> > wouldn't take me long and I likely wouldn't have made a vote on releasing
> > RC2.
> >
> > So, if no one is opposed to it, we may consider to wait on RC2,
> regenerate
> > new documentation after I push the changes to SVN, and package it for
> > another RC (Sorry, Prescott!!).  It might be nice to have those
> > documentation issues fixed.  Like I said before, I hadn't really expected
> > to finish it so quickly, and hadn't even though it could be ready in time
> > for 2.9.4 release.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Christopher
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message