lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Jordan <robe...@gmx.net>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Date Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:59:24 GMT
On 21.09.2011 21:40, Michael Herndon wrote:
> @all,
>
> I updated the build scripts to increase it's granularity.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/LUCENENET/build-system-scripts.html
>
> Similarity was include, though are there any tests for this project ?
>
> Some of the contrib tests are failing, I saw a few in Contrib.Highlighter
> just glancing at the output .

The Highlighter tests are probably failing due to a
missing

SetMultiTermRewriteMethod(MultiTermQuery.SCORING_BOOLEAN_QUERY_REWRITE):

https://github.com/robert-j/lucene.net/commit/a4cdf4bb613770913af1bf9d546d6499bed452bf

Robert


>
> I recieved some feedback Eric Woodruff. It looks like SHFB&  Sandcastle
> generate a plain file html, its been staring me in the face this whole time.
>   I'll need to build in some targets that extract whats needed to push to
> site branch. Then I'll start working on nuget.
>
> @Prescott,
> Can the volatile fields be wrapped in a lock statement and code that access
> those fields with replaced with call to a property /method that wraps access
> to that field?
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Troy Howard<thoward37@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> I thought it was:
>>
>> 2.9.2 and before are 2.0 compatible
>> 2.9.4 and before are 3.5 compatible
>> After 2.9.4 are 4.0 compatible
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Troy
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Michael Herndon
>> <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net>  wrote:
>>> if thats the case, then well need conditional statements for including
>>> ThreadLocal<T>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Prescott Nasser<geobmx540@hotmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I thought this was after 2.9.4
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my Windows Phone
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Michael Herndon
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 8:30 AM
>>>> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>> Cc: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>>>>
>>>> @Robert,
>>>>
>>>> I believe the overwhelming consensus on the mailing list vote was to
>> move
>>>> to
>>>> .NET 4.0 and drop support for previous versions.
>>>>
>>>> I'll take care of build scripts issue while they being refactored into
>>>> smaller chunks this week.
>>>>
>>>> @Troy, Agreed.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Robert Jordan<robertj@gmx.net>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 20.09.2011 23:48, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey all seems like we are set with 2.9.4? Feedback has been positive
>> and
>>>>>> its been quiet. Do we feel ready to vote for a new release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know if the build infrastructure is part of the
>>>>> release. If yes, then there is an open issue:
>>>>>
>>>>> Contrib doesn't build right now because there
>>>>> are some assembly name mismatches between certain *.csproj
>>>>> files and  build/scripts/contrib.targets.
>>>>>
>>>>> The following patches should fix the issue:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/robert-j/**lucene.net/commit/**
>>>>> c5218bca56c19b3407648224781eec**7316994a39<
>>>>
>> https://github.com/robert-j/lucene.net/commit/c5218bca56c19b3407648224781eec7316994a39
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/robert-j/**lucene.net/commit/**
>>>>> 50bad187655d59968d51d472b57c2a**40e201d663<
>>>>
>> https://github.com/robert-j/lucene.net/commit/50bad187655d59968d51d472b57c2a40e201d663
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, the fix for [LUCENENET-358] is basically making
>>>>> Lucene.Net.dll a .NET 4.0-only assembly:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/**lucene.net/commit/**
>>>>> 23ea6f52362fc7dbce48fd012cea12**9a7350c73c<
>>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/commit/23ea6f52362fc7dbce48fd012cea129a7350c73c
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Did we agree about abandoning .NET<= 3.5?
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>



Mime
View raw message