lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Date Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:22:54 GMT

Thanks Itamar!

----------------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:22:59 +0300
> From: itamar@code972.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> We have been running some extensive tests >30hrs now against the 2.9.4
> branch, and did not detect any leaks. We will have it running a few more
> days, if you wish to wait for more conclusive findings.
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> > 2.9.4 would make it in I assume because that will be our next official
> > release.
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Windows Phone
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Herndon
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:12 AM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> > > What version is going to make it to nuget? 2.9.4 or 2.9.4g?
> > ooo totally forgot about nuget. we definitely need to get that setup.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:46 AM, digy digy <digydigy@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to
> > only
> > > 2.9.4g branch.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431
> > >
> > > DIGY
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to
> > > > measure memory usage among other things.
> > > >
> > > > There is one show stopper tho. There was a patch sent by Matt Warren
> > for
> > > > Spatial.Net, that doesn't seem to be in. See
> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/ravendb/msg/7517f095810c48f3
> > > >
> > > > Any chance you can get it in to 2.9.4?
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days
> > and
> > > > > will let you know how it went.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon <
> > > > > mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler
or
> > from
> > > > >> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with
> > svn.
> > > > >> I'll
> > > > >> check next time I push something to svn.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> But both of those items have made it to the mirror.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> - michael
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <digydigy@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
> > > > >> > These are the original locations
> > > > >> > 2.9.4
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
> > > > >> > 2.9.4g
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
> > > > >> > 9_4g/
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > >> > DIGY
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> > From: itamar.synhershko@gmail.com [mailto:
> > > itamar.synhershko@gmail.com
> > > > ]
> > > > >> On
> > > > >> > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
> > > > >> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > > >> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch,
also for
> > > > >> > potential
> > > > >> > memory leaks
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated
> > 2.9.4
> > > > tag
> > > > >> I
> > > > >> > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix
+ the
> > > > strongly
> > > > >> > signed patch applied to it?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > 2011/9/6 Digy <digydigy@gmail.com>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > To avoid misunderstanding...
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Community==all Lucene.Net users
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > DIGY
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> > > From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> > > > >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> > > > >> > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> > > > >> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback
instead of
> > > > >> testing
> > > > >> > > against all projects using Lucene.Net
> > > > >> > > DIGY
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattdebs@gmail.com]
> > > > >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> > > > >> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > If you want to test it against a large project you
could take a
> > > look
> > > > >> at
> > > > >> > how
> > > > >> > > RavenDB uses it?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> > > > >> > > )
> > > > >> > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check
that all
> > > > it's
> > > > >> > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large
test
> > case.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <
> > geobmx540@hotmail.com
> > > >
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Hey All,
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base?
I've been using
> > it
> > > > for
> > > > >> > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent.
Do we feel we
> > are
> > > > >> ready
> > > > >> > to
> > > > >> > > > package this up and make it an official release?
Or do we have
> > > > some
> > > > >> > tasks
> > > > >> > > > left to take care of?
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > ~Prescott
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > 		 	   		  
Mime
View raw message