lucenenet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
Date Fri, 23 Sep 2011 03:14:41 GMT

Before I go replacing all the volatile fields I wanted to run this past the list:

 

private System.IO.StreamWriter infoStream;


into

 

private object o = new object();
private System.IO.StreamWriter _infoStream;
private System.IO.StreamWriter infoStream
{
         get
         {
                lock (o)
                {
                    return _infoStream;
                }
         }
            set
            {
                lock (o)
                {
                    _infoStream = value;
                }
            }
     }  

 

 

Sorry, I don't normally deal with locks..

 

Thanks for any guidance

 

~P

>
> @Prescott,
> Can the volatile fields be wrapped in a lock statement and code that access
> those fields with replaced with call to a property /method that wraps access
> to that field?
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Troy Howard <thoward37@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I thought it was:
> >
> > 2.9.2 and before are 2.0 compatible
> > 2.9.4 and before are 3.5 compatible
> > After 2.9.4 are 4.0 compatible
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Troy
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Michael Herndon
> > <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> > > if thats the case, then well need conditional statements for including
> > > ThreadLocal<T>
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx540@hotmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> I thought this was after 2.9.4
> > >>
> > >> Sent from my Windows Phone
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Michael Herndon
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 8:30 AM
> > >> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > >> Cc: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >>
> > >> @Robert,
> > >>
> > >> I believe the overwhelming consensus on the mailing list vote was to
> > move
> > >> to
> > >> .NET 4.0 and drop support for previous versions.
> > >>
> > >> I'll take care of build scripts issue while they being refactored into
> > >> smaller chunks this week.
> > >>
> > >> @Troy, Agreed.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Robert Jordan <robertj@gmx.net>
wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On 20.09.2011 23:48, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Hey all seems like we are set with 2.9.4? Feedback has been positive
> > and
> > >> >> its been quiet. Do we feel ready to vote for a new release?
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > I don't know if the build infrastructure is part of the
> > >> > release. If yes, then there is an open issue:
> > >> >
> > >> > Contrib doesn't build right now because there
> > >> > are some assembly name mismatches between certain *.csproj
> > >> > files and build/scripts/contrib.targets.
> > >> >
> > >> > The following patches should fix the issue:
> > >> >
> > >> > https://github.com/robert-j/**lucene.net/commit/**
> > >> > c5218bca56c19b3407648224781eec**7316994a39<
> > >>
> > https://github.com/robert-j/lucene.net/commit/c5218bca56c19b3407648224781eec7316994a39
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > https://github.com/robert-j/**lucene.net/commit/**
> > >> > 50bad187655d59968d51d472b57c2a**40e201d663<
> > >>
> > https://github.com/robert-j/lucene.net/commit/50bad187655d59968d51d472b57c2a40e201d663
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Also, the fix for [LUCENENET-358] is basically making
> > >> > Lucene.Net.dll a .NET 4.0-only assembly:
> > >> >
> > >> > https://github.com/apache/**lucene.net/commit/**
> > >> > 23ea6f52362fc7dbce48fd012cea12**9a7350c73c<
> > >>
> > https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/commit/23ea6f52362fc7dbce48fd012cea129a7350c73c
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Did we agree about abandoning .NET <= 3.5?
> > >> >
> > >> > Robert
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > 		 	   		  
Mime
View raw message